From: "Yaron Minsky" <yminsky@gmail.com>
To: "David Teller" <David.Teller@univ-orleans.fr>
Cc: OCaml <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [OSR] OCaml Standard Recommandation Process
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 09:24:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <891bd3390801270624h4df6cdadn9d5e888dae615280@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1201440183.6302.27.camel@Blefuscu>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2240 bytes --]
What is it that is meant to be standardized by this process? Is this meant
to be parallel to the Java Community Process or Python's PEPs (Python
Enhancement Proposals)? Those are not just about "best practices", but are
actually about code, language features, APIs, etc. I don't at first glance
see any real use in agreeing on best practices for OCaml. Can you give some
examples of what would make a reasonable OSR? That might clarify the
purpose of them considerably.
y
On Jan 27, 2008 8:23 AM, David Teller <David.Teller@univ-orleans.fr> wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> As I have mentioned in my previous message, during the OCaml Developer
> Days, the INRIA team has made clear that, among other things, the
> community is essentially in charge of recommending best practices,
> standards, etc. A candidate name has been suggested: "OSR", for "OCaml
> Standard Recommandations."
>
> While we already have a few tools for this kind of discussions, (I'm
> thinking about the current mailing-list and the Cocan Wiki), at the
> moment, we are lacking organisation and a way of committing to a
> decision.
>
> Let me suggest the following process:
> * anyone on this mailing-list may ask for or suggest best practises --
> to do so, please put [OSR] in the header of your e-mail
> * after some debate, if one or more solutions have emerged, we put these
> solutions on the appropriate page of the Cocan Wiki, with summaries of
> pros and cons and an official space for voting and suggesting future
> improvements
> * if the vote proves conclusive, we move the chosen solution from the
> voting stage to some page on that Wiki, say "recommended practises."
>
> Does this seem an acceptable method ?
>
> Regards,
> David
> --
> David Teller
> Security of Distributed Systems
> http://www.univ-orleans.fr/lifo/Members/David.Teller
> Angry researcher: French Universities need reforms, but the LRU act
> brings liquidations.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
> http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
> Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3023 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-27 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-27 13:23 David Teller
2008-01-27 13:52 ` [Caml-list] " Paolo Donadeo
2008-01-27 14:24 ` Yaron Minsky [this message]
2008-01-27 19:07 ` David Teller
2008-01-27 21:07 ` Jon Harrop
2008-01-27 21:47 ` Yaron Minsky
2008-01-28 11:06 ` David Teller
2008-01-28 12:04 ` Jon Harrop
2008-01-28 12:31 ` David Teller
2008-01-28 14:23 ` Brian Hurt
2008-01-28 15:15 ` Loup Vaillant
2008-01-28 15:40 ` Brian Hurt
2008-01-28 19:46 ` Jon Harrop
2008-01-28 15:25 ` Jon Harrop
2008-01-28 16:06 ` Christophe TROESTLER
2008-01-28 16:20 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2008-01-28 16:45 ` Christophe TROESTLER
2008-01-28 16:51 ` Olivier Andrieu
2008-01-28 19:58 ` Jon Harrop
2008-01-29 7:51 ` Gordon Henriksen
2008-01-28 20:49 ` Jon Harrop
2008-01-28 22:05 ` Till Varoquaux
2008-01-28 23:10 ` Jon Harrop
2008-01-28 16:37 ` Brian Hurt
2008-01-28 17:30 ` David Teller
2008-01-28 20:43 ` Jon Harrop
2008-01-28 21:12 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2008-01-28 21:39 ` Jon Harrop
2008-01-29 16:49 ` Edgar Friendly
2008-01-30 8:52 ` Sylvain Le Gall
2008-01-30 10:02 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2008-01-30 12:12 ` Vincent Hanquez
2008-01-28 21:43 ` [Caml-list] " Dario Teixeira
2008-01-29 7:59 ` Francois Pottier
2008-01-28 22:07 ` Arnaud Spiwack
2008-01-27 14:36 ` Michaël Grünewald
2008-01-27 15:10 ` Dario Teixeira
2008-01-28 13:38 ` Sylvain Le Gall
2008-01-28 13:52 ` [Caml-list] " David Teller
2008-01-28 0:23 ` [Caml-list] " Oliver Bandel
2008-01-30 9:43 ` Sylvain Le Gall
2008-01-30 20:25 ` [Caml-list] " blue storm
2008-01-30 20:49 ` Sylvain Le Gall
2008-01-30 20:54 ` [Caml-list] " Eric Cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=891bd3390801270624h4df6cdadn9d5e888dae615280@mail.gmail.com \
--to=yminsky@gmail.com \
--cc=David.Teller@univ-orleans.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox