From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
To: Andreas Rossberg <rossberg@mpi-sws.org>
Cc: OCaml List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Scoped Bound Resource Management just for C++?
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 22:31:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pqqzmv91.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8DECBDB1-84C6-4609-9C2A-8C9AEDE337A1@mpi-sws.org> (Andreas Rossberg's message of "Wed, 9 Feb 2011 22:12:49 +0100")
* Andreas Rossberg:
>> If you have coroutines or threads with communication among them, you
>> can always turn type-enforced region-based handles into open handles
>> with an explicit close operation.
>
> I still don't know what you are talking about. Why should a suitable
> type system not be able to make such an operation ill-typed?
It's a general problem. Once you've got message passing, you've got
mutable state and the ability to escape regions. Basically, you do
something like this:
val resource = openResource params
fun loop()
(case receiveMailbox () of
READ count => (read resource count; sendMailbox ACK; loop ())
WRITE buffer => (write resource buffer; sendMailbox ACK; loop ())
CLOSE => ())
end
val _ = loop ()
val _ = close resource
>> Like array bounds checking, integer division or other partial
>> functions. 8-)
>
> Right. But these are examples of collateral damage of useful features,
> while the one under discussion is just the damage, with no new
> expressiveness to justify it. ;)
It's not about expressiveness, it's about making writing correct (that
is, resource-aware) code easier.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-10 21:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-08 23:57 orbitz
2011-02-09 0:46 ` Guillaume Yziquel
2011-02-09 0:48 ` Jacques Garrigue
2011-02-09 6:25 ` dmitry grebeniuk
2011-02-09 12:01 ` rossberg
2011-02-09 15:15 ` orbitz
2011-02-09 16:14 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2011-02-09 16:52 ` David Rajchenbach-Teller
2011-02-09 17:54 ` orbitz
2011-02-09 21:50 ` Jon Harrop
2011-02-10 8:10 ` David Rajchenbach-Teller
2011-02-10 10:39 ` Guillaume Yziquel
2011-02-10 10:59 ` Guillaume Yziquel
2011-02-09 19:11 ` Florian Weimer
2011-02-09 20:10 ` Andreas Rossberg
2011-02-09 20:45 ` Florian Weimer
2011-02-09 21:12 ` Andreas Rossberg
2011-02-10 21:31 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2011-02-09 18:03 ` Jon Harrop
2011-02-09 20:47 ` Norman Hardy
2011-02-09 21:00 ` Gabriel Scherer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87pqqzmv91.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de \
--to=fw@deneb.enyo.de \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=rossberg@mpi-sws.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox