From: moosotc@gmail.com
To: David Allsopp <dra-news@metastack.com>
Cc: Gabriel Scherer <gabriel.scherer@gmail.com>,
caml users <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Interface(.mli) location
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 22:59:51 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mvknnia0.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E51C5B015DBD1348A1D85763337FB6D901350423CC@Remus.metastack.local> (David Allsopp's message of "Mon, 8 Aug 2016 19:39:16 +0000")
David Allsopp <dra-news@metastack.com> writes:
> moosotc@gmail.com wrote:
>> David Allsopp <dra-news@metastack.com> writes:
>> > moosotc@gmail.com wrote:
>> >> Gabriel Scherer <gabriel.scherer@gmail.com> writes:
>> >>
>> >> > It is correct that ocamldep assumes that the .ml and .mli of a
>> >> > given module are at the same place, but this is not the case for
>> >> > the rest of the compilation chain, which is either concerned with
>> >> > single source files (a .ml file or a .mli file) or with
>> >> > "compilation units" (a .cmo and .cmi files passed together,
>> >> > independently of where their source files were). In particular, all
>> >> > type-checking tools do look in -I directories to find .cmi files
>> >> > for the dependencies of the module being compiled (and at this stage
>> they do not care for .mli files).
>> >>
>> >> But the script seems to (somewhat) contradict this, i.e. after
>> >> `ocamlc -I d -c a.ml' ocamlc ignores the presence of .mli inside
>> >> subdirectory d/, producing both .cmi/.cmo when when compiling a.ml.
>> >
>> > The -I option specifies extra directories for compiled files only, so
>> > it's correct that the compiler ignores d/a.mli.
>>
>> After sending the first post I've realized that: ocamlc -c d/a.mli was
>> forgotten, but even after adding that to the script things do not change,
>> i.e. following compilation of a.ml with -I d where d contains a.cmi still
>> produces both a.cmo and a.cmi in the top-level directory.
>
> Indeed - but that's the correct documented behaviour, even if not
> necessarily the ideal. There are various things you can do:
>
> a) Delete ./a.cmi as part of your build procedure. This isn't ideal,
> though, because you lose the type-checking against d/a.cmi
> b) Have an empty ./a.mli but never compile it - the compiler will then
> unify ./a.cmo against d/a.cmi. This isn't ideal because having a
> source file which you don't expect to compile will confuse dependency
> generators and automatic build rules.
> c) Implement a new option in the compiler driver which suppresses the
> automatic generation of .cmi files (e.g. ocamlc -c -I d -no-cmi a.ml)
d) Make the compiler skip generation of .cmi if it sees one in the -I
directories?
>
>
> David
--
mailto:moosotc@gmail.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-08 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-08 16:09 moosotc
2016-08-08 17:03 ` Gabriel Scherer
2016-08-08 17:12 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2016-08-08 17:16 ` moosotc
2016-08-08 18:30 ` David Allsopp
2016-08-08 18:57 ` moosotc
2016-08-08 19:39 ` David Allsopp
2016-08-08 19:59 ` moosotc [this message]
2016-08-08 22:54 ` David Allsopp
2016-08-09 8:45 ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-09 16:26 ` David Allsopp
2016-08-09 17:55 ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-09 10:56 ` moosotc
2016-08-09 11:43 ` moosotc
2016-08-09 11:46 ` moosotc
2016-08-09 18:08 ` David Allsopp
2016-08-09 18:35 ` moosotc
2016-08-09 18:59 ` David Allsopp
2016-08-09 19:55 ` moosotc
2016-08-10 8:20 ` David Allsopp
2016-08-10 10:38 ` moosotc
2016-08-09 18:33 ` David Allsopp
2016-08-09 18:38 ` moosotc
2016-08-09 19:02 ` David Allsopp
2016-08-09 9:22 ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-09 16:32 ` David Allsopp
2016-08-09 18:10 ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-09 18:26 ` David Allsopp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mvknnia0.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=moosotc@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=dra-news@metastack.com \
--cc=gabriel.scherer@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox