From: Remi Vanicat <remi.vanicat@laposte.net>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Function forward declaration?
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 14:37:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lll9wadk.dlv@vanicat.homelinux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <60532B15DF92FD4693AA89B2F7E01D8F013F29EC@tmex02> (Timo Tapiola's message of "Tue, 6 Apr 2004 15:14:45 +0300")
Timo.Tapiola@tietoenator.com writes:
> Hi,
>
> could someone tell me if there is some way to forward declare functions in
> OCaml?
no, but you can :
use the "let rec ... and .. and ... " construct :
let rec simpl1 x y = simpl2 y x
and simpl2 x y = simpl1 y x
or use local function :
let rec simpl1 x y =
let simpl2 x y = simpl1 y x in
simpl2 y x
You can even use both technique at the same time.
The third technique is less clean, and is rarely needed : it use
references :
let simpl1_ref = ref (fun x -> assert false)
let simpl2 x y = !simpl1_ref y x
let simpl1 x y = simpl2 x y
let _ = simpl1_ref := simpl1
both two first method cover most of the case, the third one is needed
only in very long code, or in recurrence between compilation unit.
[...]
--
Rémi Vanicat
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-06 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-06 12:14 Timo.Tapiola
2004-04-06 12:20 ` Andrew Birkett
2004-04-06 12:37 ` Remi Vanicat [this message]
2004-04-06 13:00 ` Issac Trotts
2004-04-06 12:53 ` Correnson Loïc
2004-04-06 15:14 ` skaller
2004-04-06 17:39 ` brogoff
2004-04-06 17:53 ` Richard Jones
2004-04-06 19:28 ` Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
2004-04-06 22:37 ` Jon Harrop
2004-04-07 2:18 ` skaller
2004-04-07 6:01 ` Nicolas Cannasse
2004-04-07 7:31 ` Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
2004-04-07 16:40 ` brogoff
2004-04-07 13:52 ` skaller
2004-04-07 14:15 ` Richard Jones
2002-01-03 15:21 ` Issac Trotts
2004-04-07 15:51 ` skaller
2004-04-07 16:41 ` Richard Jones
2004-04-07 17:31 ` Remi Vanicat
2004-04-07 17:36 ` Richard Jones
2004-04-07 17:54 ` Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
2004-04-07 19:27 ` skaller
2004-04-07 20:24 ` Christopher Dutchyn
2004-04-07 18:04 ` Benjamin Geer
2004-04-07 19:21 ` skaller
2004-04-07 16:52 ` Shawn Wagner
2004-04-07 17:26 ` Basile Starynkevitch
2004-04-07 17:46 ` Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
2004-04-07 18:03 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-07 18:44 ` Christopher Dutchyn
2004-04-07 14:24 ` Ville-Pertti Keinonen
2004-04-07 15:12 ` skaller
2004-04-06 12:58 ` Jean-Christophe Filliatre
2004-04-06 17:26 ` Christopher Dutchyn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lll9wadk.dlv@vanicat.homelinux.org \
--to=remi.vanicat@laposte.net \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox