From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33B44BBC1 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:23:26 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjQBAOcv/kfUCb2niGdsb2JhbACRTwEBAQ8mmho X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,637,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="11321945" Received: from concorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.39]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 11 Apr 2008 00:23:25 +0200 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m3AMNPWF022372 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:23:25 +0200 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjQBAOcv/kfUCb2niGdsb2JhbACRTwEBAQ8mmho X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,637,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="11321944" Received: from mail.enyo.de ([212.9.189.167]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 11 Apr 2008 00:23:25 +0200 Received: from deneb.vpn.enyo.de ([212.9.189.177] helo=deneb.enyo.de) by mail.enyo.de with esmtp id 1Jk5Ab-0007Nc-TO; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:23:02 +0200 Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Jk5Ab-00071i-Bn; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:23:01 +0200 From: Florian Weimer To: Martin Jambon Cc: Richard Jones , caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] break and continue for OCaml References: <5b0248170804091859s75c3f725s2db53f48fba6735c@mail.gmail.com> <20080410133956.GA4065@annexia.org> Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:23:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Martin Jambon's message of "Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:05:45 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: <87bq4hnyd6.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 47FE935D.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 struct:01 syntactic:01 caml-list:01 jambon:01 lazy:02 lazy:02 constructs:02 florian:03 module:03 let:03 let:03 perhaps:05 break:08 break:08 * Martin Jambon: > I'm OK with the intent, but what should happen in such cases: > > module A = > struct > let a = break > let b = continue > let c = return true > let d = lazy (return 123) > let e () = Lazy.force d > end I think break/continue/return should be syntactic constructs (perhaps using pseudo-keywords), so that "let a = break" is as legal as say, "let a = end".