From: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Bug? Constraints get ignored in methods
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:05:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ab71ic1f.fsf@frosties.localdomain> (raw)
Hi,
I want to keep a linked list of structures that have a common subset
of functionality. I thought this would be a good use of ocaml objects.
A base class with the common subset of functionality and methods to
link them. And then derived classes for the specific types. Most
simplified it looks like this:
# class type base_type = object val mutable next : base_type option method set_next : base_type option -> unit end;;
class type base_type =
object
val mutable next : base_type option
method set_next : base_type option -> unit
end
# class base : base_type = object val mutable next = None method set_next n = next <- n end;;
class base : base_type
# class foo = object inherit base method foo = () end;;
class foo :
object
val mutable next : base_type option
method foo : unit
method set_next : base_type option -> unit
end
# let a = new base in
let b = new foo in
a#set_next (Some (b :> base_type));;
- : unit = ()
# let a = new base in
let b = new foo in
a#set_next (Some b);;
^
Error: This expression has type foo but is here used with type base_type
The second object type has no method foo
This last error isn't nice. I don't want to have to cast the objects
all the time. So I thought there must be a better way using
polymorphic methods with a constraint. But here is where everything
breaks down. First lets look at just the set_next method:
# class type virtual vbase_type = object method virtual set_next : 'a. 'a option -> unit constraint 'a = #vbase_type end;;
class type virtual vbase_type =
object method virtual set_next : 'a option -> unit end
# class virtual vbase : vbase_type = object method virtual set_next : 'a. 'a option -> unit constraint 'a = #vbase_type end;;
class virtual vbase : vbase_type
# class base = object inherit vbase method set_next _ = () end;;
class base : object method set_next : 'a option -> unit end
# let b = new base;;
val b : base = <obj>
# b#set_next (Some 1);;
- : unit = ()
Huh? That should not work. 1 is not a superset of #vbase_type. The
constraint gets completly ignored by ocaml. Adding back the next gives
further problems:
# class type virtual vbase_type = object val mutable next : #vbase_type option method virtual set_next : 'a. 'a option -> unit constraint 'a = #vbase_type end;;
class type virtual vbase_type =
object
val mutable next : #vbase_type option
method virtual set_next : 'a option -> unit
end
# class virtual vbase : vbase_type = object val mutable next = None method virtual set_next : 'a. 'a option -> unit constraint 'a = #vbase_type end;;
class virtual vbase : vbase_type
# class base = object inherit vbase
method set_next n = next <- (n :> vbase_type option) end;;
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Error: This method has type #vbase_type option -> unit
which is less general than 'a. 'a option -> unit
Again I blame ocaml for dropping the constraint. Given the constraint
the type would be correct.
So how do I have to specify the set_next method that any superset of
#base_type will be accepted as argument? Or is that a bug in ocaml and
my syntax is perfectly fine?
MfG
Goswin
next reply other threads:[~2009-03-31 22:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-31 22:05 Goswin von Brederlow [this message]
2009-03-31 23:01 ` [Caml-list] " Martin Jambon
2009-03-31 23:12 ` Martin Jambon
2009-03-31 23:52 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-04-01 0:08 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-04-01 11:41 ` Martin Jambon
2009-04-01 15:57 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-04-01 18:45 ` Martin Jambon
2009-04-01 1:24 ` Peng Zang
2009-04-01 3:25 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-04-02 8:39 ` Jacques GARRIGUE
2009-04-03 20:53 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-04-06 4:30 ` Jacques Garrigue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ab71ic1f.fsf@frosties.localdomain \
--to=goswin-v-b@web.de \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox