From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id KAA13745; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 10:16:36 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id KAA13461 for caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 10:16:35 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id HAA09899 for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 07:49:49 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mallaury.noc.nerim.net (mallaury.noc.nerim.net [62.4.17.82]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g9E5nnD19010 for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 07:49:49 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from chinon (jmarant.net1.nerim.net [62.212.105.6]) by mallaury.noc.nerim.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9AC862E3D for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 07:49:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: by chinon (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 71239886D75; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 07:49:48 +0200 (CEST) To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] CDK with Ocaml 3.06 References: <1034513637.2023.9.camel@pc-6> <1034513637.2023.9.camel@pc-6> <4.3.2.7.2.20021013161448.032e9cd0@mail.d6.com> From: jmarant@nerim.net (=?iso-8859-1?q?J=E9r=F4me?= Marant) Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 07:49:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20021013161448.032e9cd0@mail.d6.com> (Chris Hecker's message of "Sun, 13 Oct 2002 16:20:04 -0700") Message-ID: <877kglh8n7.fsf@marant.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Chris Hecker writes: >>CDK is no longer supported. So if you want to use it, you'll >>have to make the changes for ocaml 3.06 yourself. > > Is there any plan to "break up" the CDK libraries again? In some ways > it's worse now than before, because now a lot of the libraries (like > asmdynlink) depend on a ton of CDK files and patches to the compiler > because it was "convenient" to do so in the CDK. But, now that the > CDK is dead, it's even harder to separate out the libraries you want. > > So, while it was a noble effort and I really respect and appreciate > the effort and the attempt, it's kind of a lose now because all of > those previously separate useful libraries are trapped in the decaying > body! :) If it is no longer supported, how can there be any kind of plan to do something? -- Jérôme Marant http://marant.org ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners