From: Malcolm Matalka <mmatalka@gmail.com>
To: Christopher Zimmermann <christopher@gmerlin.de>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Including a C library statically in an Ocaml library
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 15:08:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86mvsgnm5y.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160108155813.118c909b@mortimer.gmerlin.de> (Christopher Zimmermann's message of "Fri, 8 Jan 2016 15:58:13 +0100")
Christopher Zimmermann <christopher@gmerlin.de> writes:
> On Fri, 08 Jan 2016 14:14:22 +0000 Malcolm Matalka <mmatalka@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> The core problem I am having is a C library I want to bind has a
>> number of macros which I need the value of. Here is how I am trying
>> to solve it, but perhaps there is a better way:
>>
>> I have a small C library which gets compiled to libfoo.a which
>> provides functions that return the macro values, like:
>>
>> int macro1() { return MACRO1; }
>>
>> I then have an ocaml library, called ofoo, that uses Ctypes to bind
>> to macro1:
>>
>> let macro1 = foreign "macro" (void @-> returning int)
>>
>> Where I am having issues is this small library, I'd prefer it to not
>> have to be installed on the system but just compiled into the Ocaml
>> library so that a user just has to link against that library. Right
>> now, none of the symbols (macro1) are being included in the library,
>
> That's no surprise. Macros are evaluated at compile time. You won't see
> their name (only their value) in the compiled object file.
This is why I'm creating a function that returns the macro value.
>
>> I'm guessing because the linker sees no direct use of them. And I'm
>> not even sure if I can get it included in the ocaml library. I'm
>> also not able to get the libfoo symbols linked into a final
>> executable, I'm guessing for similar reasons.
>>
>> What are my options here?
>>
>> If I've missed any useful information, let me know. I haven't
>> interoped much with C directory in Ocaml so I'm not sure what
>> information is important.
>
> You could hardcode the value of the macros into your ocaml code like
> this:
>
> let macro1 = 4096;;
>
> But I don't see anything wrong with your approach. If you have really
> many macros and don't want to add that many functions you could create
> a static record of all the macro values in your C stub code like this
> (not tested):
>
> value get_constants(value) {
> static value constants[5] = {
> (4 << 10), /* header for block of size 4 */
> Val_long(Macro1),
> Val_long(Macro2),
> NULL,
> Val_long(Macro4)
> };
>
> if (constants.3 == NULL) {
> constants.3 = caml_copy_string(Macro3);
> }
>
> return (constants + 1);
> }
>
>
> Christopher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-08 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-08 14:14 Malcolm Matalka
2016-01-08 14:58 ` Christopher Zimmermann
2016-01-08 15:08 ` Malcolm Matalka [this message]
2016-01-08 15:15 ` David Sheets
2016-01-08 15:19 ` Malcolm Matalka
2016-01-08 15:24 ` David Sheets
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86mvsgnm5y.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=mmatalka@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=christopher@gmerlin.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox