From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75D5FBC6B for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:05:50 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAJ39k0fUGyojimdsb2JhbACBV45DAQEBCAQGBwoICQeaIg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,226,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="21539050" Received: from smtp5-g19.free.fr ([212.27.42.35]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 21 Jan 2008 11:05:50 +0100 Received: from smtp5-g19.free.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6D3B3F6174; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:05:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from Llea.celt.neu (ron34-3-82-236-236-194.fbx.proxad.net [82.236.236.194]) by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F1483F61FF; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:05:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from Llea.celt.neu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Llea.celt.neu (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0L95gOq013316; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:05:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from michael.le_barbier@laposte.net) Received: (from michael@localhost) by Llea.celt.neu (8.14.1/8.13.8/Submit) id m0L95gWO013271; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:05:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from michael.le_barbier@laposte.net) X-Authentication-Warning: Llea.celt.neu: michael set sender to michael.le_barbier@laposte.net using -f To: ketti Cc: "ivan chollet" , caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] requests for improvement References: <20080120171034.976917000084@mwinf8313.laposte.net> <6ebe51ce0801200943r6fc405bek2b2588087da1a667@mail.gmail.com> From: michael.le_barbier@laposte.net (=?iso-8859-15?Q?Micha=EBl?= Le Barbier) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:05:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: <6ebe51ce0801200943r6fc405bek2b2588087da1a667@mail.gmail.com> (ketti's message of "Sun\, 20 Jan 2008 18\:43\:36 +0100") Message-ID: <86k5m3sg4a.fsf@Llea.celt.neu> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam: no; 0.00; one-to-one:01 ocaml:01 caml-list:01 constraint:01 writes:01 modules:02 modules:02 module:03 module:03 bsd:04 definition:07 michael:07 michael:07 split:08 split:08 ketti writes: > Hi, > > 2008/1/20 ivan chollet : >> - Any plans about giving the possibility to spread the definiti= on >> across more than one source file. Sometimes modules are more than 300 li= nes, >> so I would like to be able to split it over two or more files. Currently >> there is a one-to-one relationship between files and modules. As far as I >> know, OCaml is the only language to have such a particular constraint. > > I think this is a non issue. > Just split it in several modules and use 'include' to bring it all > together. Is that any different from what you want? If you insist on splitting source code, recombination is straightforwardly done thanks to make(1). Example: module.ml: module.1.ml module.2.ml cat ${.ALLSRC} > ${.TARGET} (For BSD Make) --=20 Micha=EBl LB