From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 649578018E for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 17:19:04 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.40,281,1496095200"; d="scan'208";a="229998877" Received: from ec-ap-2-13-07.paris.inria.fr (HELO [192.168.1.2]) ([128.93.65.24]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 29 Jun 2017 17:19:03 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) From: Damien Doligez In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 17:19:03 +0200 Cc: SP , caml users Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <8615B281-0D8A-45F0-937F-C70F4F18ABDC@inria.fr> References: <88108a18-8044-bc46-bed3-aef241b4ff48@linux-france.org> To: Julia Lawall X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] segmentation fault Hi Julia, This is a long shot, but let's see if this is the Skylake/Kaby Lake processor bug. Could you follow the instructions at the beginning of https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2017/06/msg00308.html and tell us if you have one of the buggy processors? Cheers, -- Damien > On 2017-06-23, at 19:25, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > > On Fri, 23 Jun 2017, SP wrote: > >> You can use `tailcall` attribute to verify if it is tail-call optimised. >> >> http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml/extn.html#sec246 > > Thanks. For the moment, though, I have no idea what function call is > causing the problem. > > julia > >> >> -- >> SP >> >> -- >> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: >> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list >> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners >> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs >> > > -- > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: > https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs