From: "Daniel Bünzli" <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
To: Thomas Braibant <thomas.braibant@gmail.com>
Cc: Christophe Troestler <Christophe.Troestler@umons.ac.be>,
OCaml Mailing List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: [Caml-list] opam license field (was Re: We need a rich standard library distributed with OCaml, really)
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 14:00:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8512B0149287464C82AB422D19612E5C@erratique.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHR=VkyMHTEuxc2qA=LVp9DQ3Gni3ORLQJ_F55FFTsU2p0Pq0A@mail.gmail.com>
Le vendredi, 28 août 2015 à 13:38, Thomas Braibant a écrit :
> The name of the licenses could probably be standardized a bit to make it easier to come up with white-lists.
Can't find the issue anymore but I think that Louis planned for opam lint to report non-conformance to debian's dep5 [1] format. My packages don't conform but I'm gradually moving them to this as I see them — of course having opam lint do the check will only speed up the process.
Best,
Daniel
[1] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/#license-specification
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-28 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-27 2:52 [Caml-list] We need a rich standard library distributed with OCaml, really Hongbo Zhang
2015-08-27 6:59 ` Christoph Höger
2015-08-27 7:18 ` Anthony Tavener
2015-08-27 8:17 ` Gabriel Scherer
2015-08-27 10:35 ` Romain Bardou
2015-08-27 19:55 ` Martin DeMello
2015-08-27 20:10 ` Yotam Barnoy
2015-08-27 23:24 ` Drup
2015-08-28 13:23 ` Philippe Veber
2015-08-27 20:17 ` Raoul Duke
2015-08-27 23:10 ` Martin Jambon
[not found] ` <20150827174554.14858.6618@localhost>
2015-08-27 18:42 ` [Caml-list] Fwd: " Emmanuel Surleau
2015-08-27 21:17 ` [Caml-list] " Paolo Donadeo
2015-08-27 21:51 ` Oliver Bandel
2015-08-27 21:56 ` Oliver Bandel
2015-08-27 22:04 ` Oliver Bandel
2015-08-28 0:50 ` Hongbo Zhang
2015-08-31 16:06 ` Stéphane Glondu
2015-08-31 16:14 ` Francois Berenger
2015-08-31 16:44 ` Hendrik Boom
2015-08-31 18:04 ` Ian Zimmerman
2015-08-31 17:26 ` Stéphane Glondu
2015-09-01 15:06 ` Anil Madhavapeddy
2015-08-31 17:34 ` Oliver Bandel
2015-09-01 13:46 ` Gabriel Scherer
2015-08-27 8:07 ` Sébastien Hinderer
2015-08-27 8:20 ` Daniil Baturin
2015-08-27 9:34 ` Edouard Evangelisti
2015-08-28 9:07 ` r.3
2015-08-27 8:12 ` Francois Berenger
2015-08-27 11:57 ` Drup
2015-08-27 14:17 ` Yaron Minsky
2015-08-27 16:00 ` Jesse Haber-Kucharsky
2015-08-28 0:33 ` Hongbo Zhang
2015-08-28 1:53 ` Daniel Bünzli
[not found] ` <20150828.140826.2157566405742612169.Christophe.Troestler@umons.ac.be>
2015-08-28 12:38 ` Thomas Braibant
2015-08-28 13:00 ` Daniel Bünzli [this message]
2015-08-28 13:06 ` [Caml-list] opam license field (was Re: We need a rich standard library distributed with OCaml, really) David Sheets
2015-08-28 14:01 ` [Caml-list] We need a rich standard library distributed with OCaml, really Oliver Bandel
2015-08-31 15:26 ` Hendrik Boom
2015-08-28 14:35 ` Alain Frisch
2015-08-29 19:02 ` David MENTRÉ
2015-08-31 12:37 ` Jon Harrop
2015-08-31 15:05 ` Emmanuel Surleau
2015-08-31 17:31 ` Oliver Bandel
2015-08-28 15:02 ` Simon Cruanes
2015-08-28 15:27 ` Gabriel Scherer
2015-08-28 15:51 ` Oliver Bandel
2015-08-31 18:40 ` Ashish Agarwal
2016-03-27 20:54 ` Jon Harrop
2016-03-27 21:21 ` Simon Cruanes
2016-03-27 23:48 ` Yaron Minsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8512B0149287464C82AB422D19612E5C@erratique.ch \
--to=daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch \
--cc=Christophe.Troestler@umons.ac.be \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=thomas.braibant@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox