From: "Christopher A. Watford" <christopher.watford@gmail.com>
To: Caml Mailing List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Cc: Tiago Dionizio <tngd81@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] *s ignored on windows gui
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 22:21:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8008871f041026192114469d5d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8008871f0410261730ef46a39@mail.gmail.com>
Here is some output from my recently applied changes:
# print_string "**e";;
**e- : unit = ()
# print_char '*';;
*- : unit = ()
# print_char '\t';;
- : unit = ()
#
print_char '*';;
*- : unit = ()
#
Note the crappy leading space if you use lots of lines.... I'm not
sure how I should go about checking for things like that. The old code
removed all whilespace leading the output (and those *'s, hehe sorry).
Is the desired functionality leaving the output intact? If so the
above looks like this:
# print_string "**e";;
**e- : unit = ()
# print_char '*';;
*- : unit = ()
# print_char '\t';;
- : unit = ()
#
print_char '*';;
*- : unit = ()
#
With only a bunch of leading white space when you use more than 1
line. Should I have it detect and remove 1 space for each extra line?
The reality of what goes on is accurately shown below:
#
print_char '*';;
*- : unit = ()
#
Note I used no indentation between lines, and no indentation appeared
in my output. I think it would require a bit of extra work, but I
might could finagle keeping track of indentation for removal in the
output.
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 20:30:28 -0400, Christopher A. Watford
<christopher.watford@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok let me explain why I trim these.
>
> What happens when some luser forgets to terminate a comment, a string,
> etc, the damn redirected shell process puts out either ' *' at the
> front of a line, or just extra spaces. The actual variables etc aren't
> being trimmed, just the output.
>
> I'll try and work around having to trim those with some more
> intelligent checks for user input failures.
>
> Thanks for pointing out that bug! Keep them coming!
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:38:02 +0000, Tiago Dionizio <tngd81@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I didn't try with 3.07, only started working with OCaml recently.
> >
> > Although this is a very rough attempt on locating the problem, this
> > might have something to do with it:
> >
> > on file win32caml/ocaml.c around the line 1319 here is what i found:
> >
> > ...
> > case WM_TIMERTICK:
> > /** Modified by Chris Watford 21 Sept 2003 **/
> > hwndChild = (HWND) GetWindowLong(hwnd, DWL_USER);
> >
> > if (ReadToLineBuffer())
> > {
> > int errMsg = 0;
> > char *p, *l = lineBuffer;
> >
> > // Ok we read something. Display the
> > trimmed version
> > while(((*l) == ' ') || ((*l) == '\t')
> > || ((*l) == '\n') || ((*l) == '\r') || ((*l) == '*'))
> > l++;
> > ...
> >
> > I have no idea why it trims empty spaces and the *'s. There may be a
> > good reason for this to happen.. but i did get very confused when this
> > happened to me the first time.
> >
> > Tiago
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 09:06:01 -0700, David Brown <caml-list@davidb.org> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 05:49:20PM +0200, Alex Baretta wrote:
> > >
> > > > ># print_string "**e";;
> > > > >e- : unit = ()
> > > >
> > > > Try flushing stdout.
> > >
> > > I don't think it will help, since the 'e' is getting printed, just not the
> > > '*'s before it. I don't see anything in the source that looks like it
> > > would cause this problem, but there might be something subtle. Did it
> > > happen with 3.07? The windows code changed quite a bit between.
> > >
> > > Dave
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
> > http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
> > Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
> >
>
>
> --
> Christopher A. Watford
> christopher.watford@gmail.com
> http://dorm.tunkeymicket.com
>
--
Christopher A. Watford
christopher.watford@gmail.com
http://dorm.tunkeymicket.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-27 2:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-26 12:20 Tiago Dionizio
2004-10-26 15:49 ` [Caml-list] " Alex Baretta
2004-10-26 16:06 ` David Brown
[not found] ` <c5a3ec0104102610237b92dcaa@mail.gmail.com>
2004-10-26 21:38 ` Tiago Dionizio
2004-10-27 0:30 ` Christopher A. Watford
2004-10-27 2:21 ` Christopher A. Watford [this message]
2004-10-27 3:12 ` Christopher A. Watford
2004-10-27 11:34 ` Tiago Dionizio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8008871f041026192114469d5d@mail.gmail.com \
--to=christopher.watford@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=tngd81@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox