From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id PAA22496; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:35:15 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA22175 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:35:14 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.203]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i9JDZDCw022101 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:35:14 +0200 Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 79so292148rnk for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 06:35:13 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=aygOvdv/gvpQzD0GVkO8mZcpSOnzye8N0NUu0cptxL1Czskxlg1j6it6anoFtRqMLWym3m26tjr+aQV35ntDFZpthQQgcCJGTITUdJ/k3kKDR6eBuXeDyLJd6O/LMNrmUjrBknu9UcG5Dhjea1sXRt+X4Z6S3yOpNuKPwJUFZF0 Received: by 10.38.96.28 with SMTP id t28mr11043rnb; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 06:35:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.75.19 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 06:35:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7f8e92aa0410190635458cf498@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 16:35:13 +0300 From: Radu Grigore Reply-To: Radu Grigore To: caml-list Subject: Re: [Caml-list] make In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <7f8e92aa041019054919917bef@mail.gmail.com> X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 41751811.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 ocamldsort:01 cyclic:01 dependencies:01 ocamake:01 ocamldep:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 nicolas:01 type:07 julien:07 modify:08 something:09 understood:09 yet:12 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Julien & Nicolas, thanks for the answers. I'll try ocamldsort first. So far I don't have cyclic type dependencies so the effort to modify ocamake is not yet warranted. A related question. Is there a good reason for ocaml to support only "# " directives, and not "#line "? I try to use nuweb and had to change it's sources to generate something that is understood by ocaml and ocamldep... -- regards, radu http://rgrig.idilis.ro/ ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners