From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <whitequark@whitequark.org>
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 440217ED9B;
	Sat, 10 May 2014 05:22:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  whitequark@whitequark.org) identity=pra;
  client-ip=176.58.103.125;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="whitequark@whitequark.org";
  x-sender="whitequark@whitequark.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of
  whitequark@whitequark.org designates 176.58.103.125 as
  permitted sender) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=176.58.103.125;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="whitequark@whitequark.org";
  x-sender="whitequark@whitequark.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@mail.whitequark.org) identity=helo;
  client-ip=176.58.103.125;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="whitequark@whitequark.org";
  x-sender="postmaster@mail.whitequark.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkJGAK6abVOwOmd9/2dsb2JhbABZg1WsCQECAQEBBoEomHABgS10giUBAQU4Aj8QBAcYLiwrBhMIiD3RNxMEhVaDPoQxgQ0HhEABA4oIokGDOzg
X-IPAS-Result: AkJGAK6abVOwOmd9/2dsb2JhbABZg1WsCQECAQEBBoEomHABgS10giUBAQU4Aj8QBAcYLiwrBhMIiD3RNxMEhVaDPoQxgQ0HhEABA4oIokGDOzg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,1022,1389740400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="72932571"
Received: from fehu.whitequark.org (HELO mail.whitequark.org) ([176.58.103.125])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 10 May 2014 05:22:49 +0200
Received: by mail.whitequark.org (Postfix, from userid 33)
	id 95F174D745; Sat, 10 May 2014 03:22:47 +0000 (UTC)
To: Yoriyuki Yamagata <yoriyuki.y@gmail.com>
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1000:rcube.php
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 07:22:47 +0400
From: Peter Zotov <whitequark@whitequark.org>
Cc: Caml List <caml-list@inria.fr>, caml-list-request@inria.fr
In-Reply-To: <CALdQWQ5bpnLuUHM+Jwo12yOPsJhMb62MnJ-88--QCD4-36_AGA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALdQWQ5bpnLuUHM+Jwo12yOPsJhMb62MnJ-88--QCD4-36_AGA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <7d9ec22d9fa8f81967f437a1435e6755@whitequark.org>
X-Sender: whitequark@whitequark.org
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.0
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [ANN] ucorelib 0.1.0

On 2014-05-10 06:52, Yoriyuki Yamagata wrote:
> Dear list,
> 
> I am pleased to announce the release of ucorelib, a new Unicode
> library for OCaml.  ucorelib provides Unicode character type, Unicode
> text type (internally ropes), and decoder/encoder of UTF-8, UTF-16,
> UTF-32.

Hello,

Any properties of your library notwithstanding, what are the reasons for
development of yet another OCaml unicode library? There are:

   * Uutf+Uucd
   * Camomile
   * ocaml-text
   * ucslib[1]

I can believe that there are good reasons for doing so, I'm just curious
what they are.

[1]: https://github.com/pippijn/ucslib

-- 
Peter Zotov
sip:whitequark@sipnet.ru