From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1BE3801D7 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 21:34:02 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=sp@orbitalfox.com; spf=None smtp.mailfrom=sp@orbitalfox.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@orbitalfox.com Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of sp@orbitalfox.com) identity=pra; client-ip=95.172.232.202; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="sp@orbitalfox.com"; x-sender="sp@orbitalfox.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of sp@orbitalfox.com) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=95.172.232.202; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="sp@orbitalfox.com"; x-sender="sp@orbitalfox.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@orbitalfox.com) identity=helo; client-ip=95.172.232.202; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="sp@orbitalfox.com"; x-sender="postmaster@orbitalfox.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3AWDoJaBOVxGhAyqeD7fMl6mtUPXoX/o7sNwtQ0KIM?= =?us-ascii?q?zox0K/j/rarrMEGX3/hxlliBBdydsK0UzbeO+4nbGkU+or+5+EgYd5JNUxJXwe?= =?us-ascii?q?43pCcHRPC/NEvgMfTxZDY7FskRHHVs/nW8LFQHUJ2mPw6a8TWO6msZExD7cA50?= =?us-ascii?q?PfjdG4jIjs3x2frh1YfUZlBzvHLpeqtaKw+8rBnYsscRkc1pLaNnmUiBmWdBZ+?= =?us-ascii?q?kDnTAgHlmUhRupvso=3D?= X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BOCgD9Qu5Z/8rorF9bHAEBBAEBCgEBG?= =?us-ascii?q?AEFAQsBgzRnayeDeopDjyGBVJhwhTsKAgyESEMUAQEBAQEBAQEBAQFqKII4IoJ?= =?us-ascii?q?EBiMdAQE4DwsaAiYCAlcTCAEBiiCnJWuCJ4MIAQEFiBUqCIEPgh+CB4M5KQuCd?= =?us-ascii?q?oVRgkiCYaFWFZZwAYlvhzWXNTYhgVt6FUmCZIJNghM/NowvAQEB?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BOCgD9Qu5Z/8rorF9bHAEBBAEBCgEBGAEFAQsBgzRnaye?= =?us-ascii?q?DeopDjyGBVJhwhTsKAgyESEMUAQEBAQEBAQEBAQFqKII4IoJEBiMdAQE4DwsaA?= =?us-ascii?q?iYCAlcTCAEBiiCnJWuCJ4MIAQEFiBUqCIEPgh+CB4M5KQuCdoVRgkiCYaFWFZZ?= =?us-ascii?q?wAYlvhzWXNTYhgVt6FUmCZIJNghM/NowvAQEB?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.43,424,1503352800"; d="scan'208";a="242071581" Received: from orbitalfox.com ([95.172.232.202]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 23 Oct 2017 21:34:02 +0200 Received: from [192.168.88.5] (unknown [192.168.88.5]) by orbitalfox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 699A8AA0064 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 19:34:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=orbitalfox.com; s=orbitalfox; t=1508787241; bh=gfaJd/yf/ERRF3SOVzmTZo1CHgcybfNjexOkSx3qqw4=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=rMgAGrFpzGFGAGUxaDSUryudCQCJT/ix1bSzcQHqQYHwfQJy0eOL8ry/TigQohn4f 4+04/07vuFAn2iemu5IRazRuoutKWSf3RSYwZxohPLpBEM38VSlSrkEq/nopIAL+Zi Dv2bS6wcfFvkPXeJqQfqge5yBxszhWxNq82Pn0qI= To: caml-list@inria.fr References: <20171019170538.73d6473c@mortimer.gmerlin.de> From: SP Message-ID: <794f27fb-97bb-9647-6f5c-341ecfdc6c98@orbitalfox.com> Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 20:34:06 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Caml-list] use cc instead of gcc as default C compiler? I think cc nowadays is a link to the default compiler of the system. On a Mac that is LLVM and on Linux distributions, mine at least, GCC. So it's a neat way to call a C compiler, instead of hard-coding GCC. Using configure scripts works fine too. So is GCC really forced anywhere or not? -- SP