From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id RAA23878 for caml-red; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 17:34:42 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA00233 for <caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr>; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 09:30:30 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from mail4.microsoft.com (mail4.microsoft.com [131.107.3.122])
	by concorde.inria.fr (8.10.0/8.10.0) with SMTP id e567UTH15356
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 09:30:29 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from 157.54.9.103 by mail4.microsoft.com (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Tue, 06 Jun 2000 00:30:31 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)
Received: by INET-IMC-04 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2651.58)
	id <MKT8ZATG>; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 00:30:31 -0700
Message-ID: <783D93998201D311B0CF00805FEAA07B7E9261@RED-MSG-42>
From: Manuel Fahndrich <maf@microsoft.com>
To: "'caml-list@inria.fr'" <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Problems with ocamlopt under windows?
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 00:30:29 -0700 
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2651.58)
Sender: weis


I'm wondering if other people are experiencing problems with ocamlopt under
windows.

I have a program that works fine as bytecode, but it runs out of stack space
when 
compiled with ocamlopt. I'm suspecting an infinite loop.

I can't seem to narrow down the problem for now, since changing the amount
of print output
masks the error.

-Manuel