From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 224D77EE88 for ; Sun, 8 May 2016 16:19:26 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:PiSZuxbfDpuMVxn61tIBqfT/LSx+4OfEezUN459isYplN5qZpcS9bnLW6fgltlLVR4KTs6sC0LqH9fm4EjNcqb+681k8M7V0HycfjssXmwFySOWkMmbcaMDQUiohAc5ZX0Vk9XzoeWJcGcL5ekGA6ibqtW1aJBzzOEJPK/jvHcaK1oLsh7H0osWYPFkArQH+SI0xBS3+lR/WuMgSjNkqAYcK4TyNnEF1ff9Lz3hjP1OZkkW0zM6x+Jl+73YY4Kp5pIZoGJ/3dKUgTLFeEC9ucyVsvJWq5lH/Sl6m4n8VVC0pnxVBBUCR5RX+V5HuvyTzsMJ03C2TO9L7QrkyHzivufRFUhjt3QsOLT8+uF3ai9x9jbhS6EatrgZ+xMjIbYCFOftkd4vbed4LWWdHGM1WUnoSUcuHc4ITAr9Zbq5jpI7nqg5L9EPmCA== Authentication-Results: mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=dario.teixeira@nleyten.com; spf=None smtp.mailfrom=dario.teixeira@nleyten.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@relay3-d.mail.gandi.net Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of dario.teixeira@nleyten.com) identity=pra; client-ip=217.70.183.195; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="dario.teixeira@nleyten.com"; x-sender="dario.teixeira@nleyten.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of dario.teixeira@nleyten.com) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=217.70.183.195; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="dario.teixeira@nleyten.com"; x-sender="dario.teixeira@nleyten.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@relay3-d.mail.gandi.net) identity=helo; client-ip=217.70.183.195; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="dario.teixeira@nleyten.com"; x-sender="postmaster@relay3-d.mail.gandi.net"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DEAADbSS9Xj8O3RtlehRC5EoF2hhACgRs5EwEBAQEBAQEBEQEBAQEHCwsJIS+CLYIVAQEDATgCMQ4FCwQHRlcGG4gbDL4AAQEIAgEdhiCETIoYBZgigVWMQIFaAY1DjzkCIgGCVYFWiHR/AQEB X-IPAS-Result: A0DEAADbSS9Xj8O3RtlehRC5EoF2hhACgRs5EwEBAQEBAQEBEQEBAQEHCwsJIS+CLYIVAQEDATgCMQ4FCwQHRlcGG4gbDL4AAQEIAgEdhiCETIoYBZgigVWMQIFaAY1DjzkCIgGCVYFWiHR/AQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,596,1454972400"; d="scan'208";a="217294147" Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 May 2016 16:19:25 +0200 Received: from mfilter17-d.gandi.net (mfilter17-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.145]) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8D56A80D1; Sun, 8 May 2016 16:19:25 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter17-d.gandi.net Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([IPv6:::ffff:217.70.183.195]) by mfilter17-d.gandi.net (mfilter17-d.gandi.net [::ffff:10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cOREqQsYG8_A; Sun, 8 May 2016 16:19:24 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 10.58.1.141 Received: from webmail.gandi.net (webmail1-d.mgt.gandi.net [10.58.1.141]) (Authenticated sender: dario.teixeira@nleyten.com) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0EB07A80C7; Sun, 8 May 2016 16:19:22 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 08 May 2016 15:19:22 +0100 From: Dario Teixeira To: Allan Wegan Cc: caml-list@inria.fr In-Reply-To: <572F40BA.1010606@allanwegan.de> References: <0a49598f1e0c8838fa69cd4d803af83d@nleyten.com> <572F40BA.1010606@allanwegan.de> Message-ID: <7764cc4cbfcb7c2d955eb1bbc2bfe070@nleyten.com> X-Sender: dario.teixeira@nleyten.com User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.2 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Menhir grammar with sequences delimited by same token Hi, > I am only a beginner at formal language theory - so might have missed > important details. > But it seems to me that you may be trying to parse a context-sensitive > language with a parser for context-free languages. Changing the parser > may help. Any Chomsky hierarchy experts in the audience?... ;-) Best regards, Dario Teixeira