From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A602ABBCA for ; Mon, 12 May 2008 22:06:32 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhoDAINAKEhKfS4cb2dsb2JhbACCNTaPIgEMAwQECRSVEYRR X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,475,1204498800"; d="scan'208";a="26089394" Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.46.28]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 12 May 2008 22:06:00 +0200 Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 5so1510502ywb.3 for ; Mon, 12 May 2008 13:05:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=1vpdESPUuMjAu13RX8sAo5RajeBLsx/jVl5EYmaKdkg=; b=G4nVqlQR40ZFHlviMe2R5TqRGiqQsgoiC+0KNCUqhmysb22PvHUsOjK2llLbR0ToTzx1zC9UoK+gQFu+3USz9fFS9dgtov9jq4YqUGNylSzrylSJ5KnGwP6AYD7FFXC//EjkXN4GNDmgX7hGzP58anssZ0pGnRwF/Q6Scy+WS00= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Yrc58jjPJsj1fq6+w0ORSOdUbGHJVqwnQTpRywk14rE5hJ25GYqpFeoO1bEw8Wmx75CtSGagCWLJKMpNQ8q5C4YLZGIUMc/Jn0sEK0gM/oAezbgsyr0yDgxPm7gCyRaZORE3DT88/0LQ5smNTi/sCOdXswTeKwY+epcyPSE5/SY= Received: by 10.150.229.16 with SMTP id b16mr8709189ybh.239.1210622755076; Mon, 12 May 2008 13:05:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.190.7 with HTTP; Mon, 12 May 2008 13:05:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <74cabd9e0805121305o16a8796o829422f3869a5044@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 13:05:54 -0700 From: "Arthur Chan" To: "Jon Harrop" Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Why OCaml rocks Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr In-Reply-To: <200805121907.12615.jon@ffconsultancy.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_2593_18815712.1210622754989" References: <200805090139.54870.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <200805102059.54856.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <20080512132223.GA24858@annexia.org> <200805121907.12615.jon@ffconsultancy.com> X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 parallelism:01 ocaml:01 toying:01 erlang:01 parallelism:01 toying:01 erlang:01 in-house:98 in-house:98 caml-list:01 bay:01 bay:01 chan:04 parallel:05 X-Attachments: cset="UTF-8" cset="UTF-8" ------=_Part_2593_18815712.1210622754989 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline > > > The fact is, this is hugely important to the vast majority of the software > industry and companies are investing massive amounts of time and effort > into > parallelizing their software. Developers are flocking to .NET because it > makes parallelism easy and OCaml has the potential to provide these > benefits > if the parallel GC project flies. > > Maybe... while I agree with your earlier points, I have not seen *any* .NET uptake in the bay area, particularly with startups. People are using Hadoop, or some in-house version of it, or toying with Erlang, to get parallel efficiency. ------=_Part_2593_18815712.1210622754989 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline

The fact is, this is hugely important to the vast majority of the software
industry and companies are investing massive amounts of time and effort into
parallelizing their software. Developers are flocking to .NET because it
makes parallelism easy and OCaml has the potential to provide these benefits
if the parallel GC project flies.

Maybe...  while I agree with your earlier points, I have not seen *any* .NET uptake in the bay area, particularly with startups.  People are using Hadoop, or some in-house version of it, or toying with Erlang, to get parallel efficiency.
------=_Part_2593_18815712.1210622754989--