From: "Loup Vaillant" <loup.vaillant@gmail.com>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Polymorphic recursion
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 14:54:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6f9f8f4a0704040554j7b24a125ta11537459cb7f503@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46133740.3070305@inria.fr>
Thanks, everybody.
Now, does anyone have an idea of the overheads? I can build syntactic
sugar for all three case (using my "not yet build" Lisp syntax), so
which is more efficient?
Classes?
Recursive modules?
Records?
Thanks,
Loup
2007/4/4, Alain Frisch <Alain.Frisch@inria.fr>:
> Jeremy Yallop wrote:
> > Right. You can write polymorphic-recursive functions if you wrap them
> > in recursive modules, though:
> >
> > module rec Size : sig val size : 'a seq -> int end = struct
> > let rec size = function
> > | Unit -> 0
> > | Seq (_, b) -> 1 + 2 * Size.size b
> > end
>
> Note that you don't even need the "rec" in this example, and that the
> same idiom would support mutually recursive functions. To make an
> automatic translation simpler, you can simply "open Size" at the
> beginning of the structure to avoid rewriting self-references in the
> function's body. To support local definitions, you can of course rely on
> local modules:
>
> let rec f : 'a 'b. t = E1 in E2
>
> becomes:
>
> let module X = struct
> module rec Y : sig val f : t end = struct
> open Y
> let f = E1
> end
> open Y
> let v = E2
> end in
> X.v
>
> However, this encoding has an important drawback: you cannot use type
> variables currently in scope in t, E1, E2 (as a consequence, we don't
> need to explicitly quantify over variables in the function prototype,
> the encoding forces all the variables in the function's type to be
> universally quantified). By changing the encoding, you can allow
> references to those type variables in E2:
>
> let f =
> let module X = struct
> module rec Y : sig val f : t end = struct
> open Y
> let f = E1
> end
> end in
> X.Y.f
> in
> E2
>
>
> -- Alain
>
> _______________________________________________
> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
> http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
> Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-04 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-03 16:59 Loup Vaillant
2007-04-03 17:20 ` [Caml-list] " Jeremy Yallop
2007-04-04 5:27 ` Alain Frisch
2007-04-04 12:54 ` Loup Vaillant [this message]
2007-04-03 17:35 ` Till Varoquaux
2007-04-03 20:00 ` brogoff
2007-04-04 1:27 ` skaller
2007-04-04 1:40 ` skaller
2007-04-04 13:49 ` Roland Zumkeller
2007-04-04 15:13 ` Alain Frisch
2007-04-04 15:20 ` Alain Frisch
2007-04-04 16:45 ` Roland Zumkeller
2007-04-04 19:58 ` Alain Frisch
2007-04-04 20:13 ` brogoff
2007-04-05 9:33 ` Roland Zumkeller
2007-04-05 9:54 ` Alain Frisch
2007-04-05 10:07 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2007-04-05 9:46 ` Francois Maurel
2007-04-04 15:50 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-04-04 23:36 ` [Caml-list] " Brian Hurt
2007-04-05 8:17 ` Loup Vaillant
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-05-12 21:55 polymorphic recursion Jacques Le Normand
2008-05-12 22:16 ` [Caml-list] " Christophe TROESTLER
2003-08-24 18:01 [Caml-list] Polymorphic recursion Lukasz Stafiniak
2003-08-25 0:30 ` Jacques Garrigue
2003-08-25 0:43 ` Jacques Garrigue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6f9f8f4a0704040554j7b24a125ta11537459cb7f503@mail.gmail.com \
--to=loup.vaillant@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox