From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE, SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30577BC68 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:59:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.189]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9PAx4FX032577 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:59:04 +0200 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id y38so547180nfb for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 03:59:04 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=PGC6+rMUY71wBJbGgCMWnkAGGtfVRs6q+ep9x/I7GZoZQCM9YZgiDQZ9HvtunQrD/Ra4vhiMeL48gxIjP3gGh+Lc6BRexgo2qEUK5e+PLB4aWHf6fzihckATSZHINiV42srCKFsr2AiTUjJvSXTVhir7c9/0rPUZUZJxG2sQuHI= Received: by 10.78.203.15 with SMTP id a15mr219786hug; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 03:59:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.100.6 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 03:59:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6dbd4d000610250359n3c73cd7eh230e7911ab70d74a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 06:59:04 -0400 From: "Denis Bueno" To: "Richard Jones" Subject: Re: Re: [Caml-list] Trouble with doubly-linked, circular list using lazy evaluation Cc: "OCaml Mailing List" In-Reply-To: <20061025090158.GA25904@furbychan.cocan.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <6dbd4d000610241846g5a19a56u4630c7b10e5fbffb@mail.gmail.com> <20061025090158.GA25904@furbychan.cocan.org> X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 453F4378.000 on concorde : j-chkmail score : X : 0/20 1 X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 453F4378.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 bug:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 lazy:02 caml:02 fault:04 inria:06 linux:06 evaluation:09 php:88 issue:12 64.:13 using:15 trouble:17 On 10/25/06, Richard Jones wrote: > I can confirm a seg fault on OCaml 3.09.1, Linux/AMD64. Have you > thought about filing a bug here: http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/main_page.php Reported. It's issue 0004141. -Denis