From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50B1D7F0BA for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 16:47:45 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch; spf=None smtp.mailfrom=daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=pra; client-ip=74.55.86.74; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=74.55.86.74; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com) identity=helo; client-ip=74.55.86.74; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-sender="postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3A4Ze91xTk8Xnp1gm2Dt0Z+XxLctpsv+yvbD5Q0YIu?= =?us-ascii?q?jvd0So/mwa64ZxWN2/xhgRfzUJnB7Loc0qyN4vymBjNLvsfJ8ChbNscTB1ld0Y?= =?us-ascii?q?RetjdjKfDGIHWzFOTtYS0+EZYKf35e1Fb/D3JoHt3jbUbZuHy44G1aMBz+MQ1o?= =?us-ascii?q?Ora9QdaK3Iyfntq/8JzLYghOmCH1IfYrdE33/k3tsZw0iIB7N6sqgjTAuGFJdP?= =?us-ascii?q?lbjTdnLEiJnhnh6++19YJjtSJZtPUw/otdF6zxOaYgG+92FjMjZkw84szmsS7p?= =?us-ascii?q?2Q2d4npUBmkflBtFB07P8Rz8TJPwmibgrONh2TCHMIv9TeZnCnyZ8653RUqw22?= =?us-ascii?q?88PDkj/TSS05QogQ=3D=3D?= X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0A3AABXmZhYhkpWN0pdDgwBAQEBAgEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEIAQEBARUBAQEBAgEBAQEIAQEBAYQMhF6KCHKRGpU3ggyFEoEQAoMLGAEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQEBEgEBAQgLCwodL4IzBAEWAQSCFwEFI1YQCxgCAiYCAkcQBhuJawSvD?= =?us-ascii?q?oIlizwBAQEHAQEBASSBC4owh1ougjEBBJtmk2yISg+GRpMMH4E2gSCEVYEyPIg?= =?us-ascii?q?7gU4BAQE?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0A3AABXmZhYhkpWN0pdDgwBAQEBAgEBAQEIAQEBARUBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAgEBAQEIAQEBAYQMhF6KCHKRGpU3ggyFEoEQAoMLGAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBEgEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QgLCwodL4IzBAEWAQSCFwEFI1YQCxgCAiYCAkcQBhuJawSvDoIlizwBAQEHAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BASSBC4owh1ougjEBBJtmk2yISg+GRpMMH4E2gSCEVYEyPIg7gU4BAQE?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,342,1477954800"; d="scan'208";a="259065232" Received: from mail6.webfaction.com (HELO smtp.webfaction.com) ([74.55.86.74]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 06 Feb 2017 16:47:44 +0100 Received: from [172.20.10.2] (44.228.197.178.dynamic.wless.zhbmb00p-cgnat.res.cust.swisscom.ch [178.197.228.44]) by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB6E21A7861; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 15:46:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 16:46:02 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Daniel_B=C3=BCnzli?= To: Jacques Garrigue Cc: Francois BERENGER , OCaml Mailing List Message-ID: <67BCE44C836B466EBD22FC5CE5A4CD13@erratique.ch> In-Reply-To: References: <20170127142246.919C212146E@mcclellan.cs.miami.edu> <416beaa2-9430-20fe-d8fa-e9f02761378f@vanderbilt.edu> X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.4 (build 1178) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: [Caml-list] where are we on the Hoogle for OCaml front? On Saturday, 4 February 2017 at 04:58, Jacques Garrigue wrote: > For search by type signature you can use Jun Furuse's OCamlOScope: I'm a little bit curious. While I can see the benefit of having general full text search over value identifiers, type identifier and doc strings I was always a little bit dubious about type signature search -- in the end ML types for themselves are a rather weak specification language (I'm not talking about the invariants you may hide behind those of course). So beyond curiosity searches are actually people seriously using this to lookup a value they might need ? Best, Daniel