From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <camaradetux@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled 
	version=3.1.3
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D59BBC1
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Mon,  7 Apr 2008 21:17:28 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjUBAJIP+kdA6bjgd2dsb2JhbACRVwEMBQIFCRSUWoQ3
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,618,1199660400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="24714663"
Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.224])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 07 Apr 2008 21:17:27 +0200
Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c30so1249053wra.21
        for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 12:17:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        bh=FHVm9q5rfL0KkYxu8Vn7Q8FtkYODwmccNqCljSSxl9Y=;
        b=flaFnXVWkUudQUA988ubh7VpvqcxxieHWm7AP8W96j+5Oi7dICgyBhA+w9fe2WTCIyc7c4JOD9QMH9sM9Z9Js2GwI+wFn+aeYqSv1jK+A0GjrbkRQw6UMX9Ybmhdw5dN/jj5ZGEHrZnjtY6SFxQZe963VMTQ5BczZUGDmFxJC8w=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=uM9Yn8LE8V1qGYnpbGBUQA/LklQugpm36v0LeRz+mL1D/qfyU7wK99+Ydy0W+xb/embh8pplkePJjzREBj9+ZgEYFKBj2x+HPei074m9PzmiWoBZooSrE7alZMHiXN4P/Rw7USfUzlcj5QIEoZYb/DJ6NfGUMCdU91w2vUQ13+4=
Received: by 10.140.251.1 with SMTP id y1mr1735097rvh.195.1207595846671;
        Mon, 07 Apr 2008 12:17:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.131.10 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Apr 2008 12:17:26 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <666572260804071217v6e7dc07r8031e9aecbc4f065@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 21:17:26 +0200
From: Adrien <camaradetux@gmail.com>
To: peng.zang@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] License question - QPL vs. SCM
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
In-Reply-To: <200804071510.19669.peng.zang@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <47F9A346.4060900@gmail.com>
	 <200804071510.19669.peng.zang@gmail.com>
X-Spam: no; 0.00; iirc:01 kde:01 kde:01 scm:98 gpl:01 caml-list:01 patches:03 guess:04 applied:05 distributed:05 qpl:05 nader:05 source:12 license:12 license:12 

IIRC, that's who the KDE project did before Qt was released with a gpl license.
They had a local copy of Qt directly from Trolltech and distributed
patches which were automatically applied.
Trolltech even advised to get Qt's source from kde.org ! So I *guess*
it will be alright.

 ---

Adrien Nader