From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE37E7FFE1
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Thu,  6 Oct 2016 15:55:47 +0200 (CEST)
Authentication-Results: mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch; spf=None smtp.mailfrom=daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=pra;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3A0DB82hAojZMeKw4ee2NMUyQJP3N1i/DPJgcQr6Af?=
 =?us-ascii?q?oPdwSP77r8bcNUDSrc9gkEXOFd2CrakV0ayN6eu+BSRAuc/H6y9SNsQUFlcsso?=
 =?us-ascii?q?Y/oU8JOIa9E0r1LfrnPWQRPf9pcxtbxUy9KlVfA83kZlff8TWY5D8WHQjjZ0Iu?=
 =?us-ascii?q?frymUt2as8Pi7Oe/9IHJZB0Msx+8arN7IRH++QDQvckfjI8kMaE8xQfTpWNgeu?=
 =?us-ascii?q?JKyGcuLlWWyUXS/MC1qbJq9SVdv8ULY8hSVaSyK6gxS71VCHIsLm0z9snqnRTZ?=
 =?us-ascii?q?VwKT52IBXyMdkkwbUED+8BjmU8Kp4WPBve1n1XzCMA=3D=3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CQAAAvV/ZXhkpWN0pdHAEBBAEBCgEBG?=
 =?us-ascii?q?AEFAQsBgxIBAQEBAXWOLpZ+lCyCCyaFegKCOxQBAQEBAQEBAQEBARIBAQEICws?=
 =?us-ascii?q?JGS+CMhiCGAEBBCNWEAsYAgImAgJHAgENBhsMiDoECrIKjHABAQEBBgEBAQEBH?=
 =?us-ascii?q?gWBB4oKh0ssgi8BBJl/hiiLKwGIAg6GC4x3g38eg32BYIkwAQEB?=
X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CQAAAvV/ZXhkpWN0pdHAEBBAEBCgEBGAEFAQsBgxIBAQE?=
 =?us-ascii?q?BAXWOLpZ+lCyCCyaFegKCOxQBAQEBAQEBAQEBARIBAQEICwsJGS+CMhiCGAEBB?=
 =?us-ascii?q?CNWEAsYAgImAgJHAgENBhsMiDoECrIKjHABAQEBBgEBAQEBHgWBB4oKh0ssgi8?=
 =?us-ascii?q?BBJl/hiiLKwGIAg6GC4x3g38eg32BYIkwAQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,454,1473112800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="239682347"
Received: from mail6.webfaction.com (HELO smtp.webfaction.com) ([74.55.86.74])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 06 Oct 2016 15:55:47 +0200
Received: from [192.168.5.177] (134-128.dsl.iskon.hr [89.164.134.128])
	by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C510420F58B6;
	Thu,  6 Oct 2016 13:55:44 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 15:55:42 +0200
From: =?utf-8?Q?Daniel_B=C3=BCnzli?= <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
To: =?utf-8?Q?Soegtrop=2C_Michael?= <michael.soegtrop@intel.com>
Cc: "=?utf-8?Q?caml-list=40inria.fr?=" <caml-list@inria.fr>
Message-ID: <645B0ADB30534643B7294B43C28A3F3D@erratique.ch>
In-Reply-To: <0F7D3B1B3C4B894D824F5B822E3E5A172CF8E1BA@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <0F7D3B1B3C4B894D824F5B822E3E5A172CF8E1BA@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com>
X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.4 (build 1178)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocamlbuild on Windows and bash vs. cmd

On Thursday 6 October 2016 at 15:38, Soegtrop, Michael wrote:
> So I wonder if it would be appreciated by the community to have an ocamlbuild (e.g. as a configure option) which uses cmd instead of bash. I think if one does the escaping properly, this should be good for the large majority of projects out there.

See https://github.com/ocaml/ocamlbuild/issues/64

Best, 

Daniel