Mailing list for all users of the OCaml language and system.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dario Teixeira <darioteixeira@yahoo.com>
To: Martin Jambon <martin.jambon@ens-lyon.org>,
	Scott Owens <Scott.Owens@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] A sound semantics for OCaml light
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 14:46:10 +0000 (GMT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <634971.24746.qm@web54601.mail.re2.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711091512340.13989@martin.ec.wink.com>

> May I suggest another name?
> There's already Caml light.
> In my opinion, having the name start with "ocaml" is a good idea (or 
> should even be mandatory for every ocaml-derived product).
> It should just be followed by something that is reasonably not ambiguous.

Hi,

On a similar vein, has anyone noticed that "OCaml" and "O'Caml" produce
different results in Google?  Could some (naïve) language popularity
statistics be skewed unfavourably towards Ocaml because of this? And
should we as a community stick to one nomenclature to avoid this problem?...

Cheers,
Dario Teixeira



      ___________________________________________________________ 
Want ideas for reducing your carbon footprint? Visit Yahoo! For Good  http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/environment.html


  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-09 14:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-09 12:20 Scott Owens
2007-11-09 14:26 ` [Caml-list] " Martin Jambon
2007-11-09 14:46   ` Dario Teixeira [this message]
2007-11-09 15:38     ` Christopher L Conway
2007-11-09 22:08       ` [Caml-list] O'Caml vs OCaml (was: A sound semantics for OCaml light) David Allsopp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=634971.24746.qm@web54601.mail.re2.yahoo.com \
    --to=darioteixeira@yahoo.com \
    --cc=Scott.Owens@cl.cam.ac.uk \
    --cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
    --cc=martin.jambon@ens-lyon.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox