From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dario.teixeira@nleyten.com>
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D3767FBEC
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 20:48:41 +0100 (CET)
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  dario.teixeira@nleyten.com) identity=pra;
  client-ip=217.70.183.196;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="dario.teixeira@nleyten.com";
  x-sender="dario.teixeira@nleyten.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  dario.teixeira@nleyten.com) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=217.70.183.196;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="dario.teixeira@nleyten.com";
  x-sender="dario.teixeira@nleyten.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@relay4-d.mail.gandi.net) identity=helo;
  client-ip=217.70.183.196;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="dario.teixeira@nleyten.com";
  x-sender="postmaster@relay4-d.mail.gandi.net";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvkAAIbHtlTZRrfEnGdsb2JhbABbhDSDAcoJQwEBAQEBEQEBAQEBBg0JCRQuhDYVVSECJgJfG4gorWqPRpRFgSGRR4FBBYQKkU6DBohwhECDOwKBZwELAYIcgjR+AQEB
X-IPAS-Result: AvkAAIbHtlTZRrfEnGdsb2JhbABbhDSDAcoJQwEBAQEBEQEBAQEBBg0JCRQuhDYVVSECJgJfG4gorWqPRpRFgSGRR4FBBYQKkU6DBohwhECDOwKBZwELAYIcgjR+AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,757,1413237600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="96438132"
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196])
  by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 14 Jan 2015 20:48:40 +0100
Received: from mfilter30-d.gandi.net (mfilter30-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.161])
	by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31D67172055
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 20:48:40 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter30-d.gandi.net
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196])
	by mfilter30-d.gandi.net (mfilter30-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id ohpzdXxJCzjz for <caml-list@inria.fr>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2015 20:48:38 +0100 (CET)
X-Originating-IP: 10.58.1.142
Received: from webmail.gandi.net (unknown [10.58.1.142])
	(Authenticated sender: dario.teixeira@nleyten.com)
	by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E72EF1720A1
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 20:48:38 +0100 (CET)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 19:48:38 +0000
From: Dario Teixeira <dario.teixeira@nleyten.com>
To: caml-list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Message-ID: <613c24f6412e9cd1d9aae73401e1a4e9@nleyten.com>
X-Sender: dario.teixeira@nleyten.com
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.9.5
Subject: [Caml-list] Telling OCamlbuild via _tags that a file has no
 dependencies

Hi,

(I was tipped off off-list that my previous emails on this subject
may have been eaten by an over-zealous spam-filter.  Hopefully a
change of domain will take care of that problem).

To summarise, I'm trying to use 4.02's newfangled no-alias-deps on
a project whose build system is generated via OASIS.  Problem is,
OASIS uses OCamlbuild, which relies on OCamldep, which is oblivious
to no-alias-deps.  Nevertheless, for this particular use case one
could get around OCamldep's limitations simply by telling OCamlbuild
that a given file has *no* dependencies, and therefore that it should
not invoke OCamldep for it.

I know that OCamlbuild's API includes a non_dependency function.  
However,
to make integration with OASIS easier, it would be useful if one could
also express the non dependency using only _tags.  Is this at all 
possible
somehow?  Or can someone think of an alternative method of achieving the
same goal?

Thanks in advance for your attention!
Best regards,
Dario Teixeira