From: Seo Sanghyeon <sanxiyn@gmail.com>
To: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>
Cc: CUOQ Pascal <Pascal.CUOQ@cea.fr>, caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Ocamlopt x86-32 and SSE2
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 11:16:49 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5b0248170905091916p6c2d00dboda26117a3ce67dcc@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87skjdwwps.fsf@frosties.localdomain>
2009/5/10 Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>:
> Having ocaml require SSE2 is quite unacceptable for someone with a Via
> C7 cpu (they don't have SSE2, right?) Is it really that much work for
> ocaml to use option 3?
Maybe not, but don't underestimate tiny inconveniences! Even if it is
tiny more work to support x87, it could be a difference of doing it and
not doing it.
http://lesswrong.com/lw/f1/beware_trivial_inconveniences/
--
Seo Sanghyeon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-10 2:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20090509100004.353ADBC5C@yquem.inria.fr>
2009-05-09 11:38 ` CUOQ Pascal
2009-05-10 1:52 ` [Caml-list] " Goswin von Brederlow
2009-05-10 2:16 ` Seo Sanghyeon [this message]
2009-05-10 3:50 ` Jon Harrop
2009-05-11 8:05 ` Dmitry Bely
2009-05-11 9:26 ` Jon Harrop
2009-05-11 8:43 ` Dmitry Bely
2009-05-11 13:47 ` Jon Harrop
2009-05-11 9:12 ` Andrey Riabushenko
2009-05-10 8:56 ` CUOQ Pascal
2009-05-10 14:47 ` [Caml-list] " Richard Jones
2009-05-10 19:25 ` Florian Weimer
[not found] <20090511043120.976EBBC67@yquem.inria.fr>
2009-05-11 7:10 ` Pascal Cuoq
2009-05-12 9:37 ` [Caml-list] " Xavier Leroy
2009-05-12 12:40 ` Richard Jones
2009-05-13 22:30 ` Florian Weimer
2009-04-28 19:36 Ocamlopt code generator question Dmitry Bely
2009-05-05 9:24 ` [Caml-list] " Xavier Leroy
2009-05-05 9:41 ` Dmitry Bely
2009-05-08 10:21 ` [Caml-list] Ocamlopt x86-32 and SSE2 Xavier Leroy
2009-05-10 11:04 ` David MENTRE
2009-05-11 2:43 ` Jon Harrop
2009-05-10 23:12 ` Matteo Frigo
2009-05-11 2:45 ` Jon Harrop
2009-05-11 7:55 ` Dmitry Bely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5b0248170905091916p6c2d00dboda26117a3ce67dcc@mail.gmail.com \
--to=sanxiyn@gmail.com \
--cc=Pascal.CUOQ@cea.fr \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
--cc=goswin-v-b@web.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox