From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C0BCBBC1 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 03:59:19 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAMsR/UfAXQIm/2dsb2JhbACmQIUx X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,632,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="9409501" Received: from discorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.38]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 10 Apr 2008 03:59:18 +0200 Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m3A1xIlE002997 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 03:59:18 +0200 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ag8BAEMR/UfRVcisc2dsb2JhbACRSQEMAwQFCRSUPoU0 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,632,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="24821411" Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.172]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 10 Apr 2008 03:59:17 +0200 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 26so3901406wfd.0 for ; Wed, 09 Apr 2008 18:59:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=1nFt4WRedW+wMT665WP264vCsZSoxxK1avaQRtJnkYE=; b=Jt9/MnJitf+xvmYULSHeL/qYAUbzz1KAYZ+UQUVKnuwdfu9PehFU8g1IVZABlysLRxXv1zzgeT4Uc618QKmmnSzM793lDumQCz6/WJO2cBPYbI0SaxTcpCaru0akf5kJOCMiIGIAGGPtAVEA3zFn7E+uwBwr5jTAEO3uYW9hdKM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=IZE91/96/WPcWNE+szWarrPoJJQZzsFduyvaXJKBecPm5D1lfexIddcXu2PQBAFEboilTEIq7mjRaiKyCGR6l9vrKik+az1IAUaA6SmTihJWMiTFnv3XIrBd0hDnvdm0YBdWujN7KhN7wQCOpgv3TCMQ9eI0h4QVoaMmCl5KBK0= Received: by 10.142.147.20 with SMTP id u20mr251685wfd.284.1207792756236; Wed, 09 Apr 2008 18:59:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.191.7 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 18:59:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5b0248170804091859s75c3f725s2db53f48fba6735c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:59:16 +0900 From: "Sanghyeon Seo" To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: break and continue for OCaml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 47FD7476.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 ocaml:01 sparcs:01 bytecomp:01 bytegen:01 bytecode:01 seo:98 seo:98 loops:02 implement:06 devel:06 break:08 break:08 releasing:08 patch:08 I have the first cut of patch to implement break and continue inside for and while loops for OCaml. http://sparcs.kaist.ac.kr/~tinuviel/devel/ocaml/ Patch is against OCaml 3.10.2. All the meat is in bytecomp/bytegen.ml. Currently bytecode only. I am working on natvie code and error handling when break is used outside loop etc but I thought "releasing early" could be useful. What do you think? -- Seo Sanghyeon