Re: [Caml-list] function polymorphic in number of arguments?

Re: [Caml-list] function polymorphic in number of arguments?

[Quetzalcoatl Bradley]

Actually I wanted to pass the same parameters to both g and h but your 
solution is obvious and simple.  if all the arguments of g and h are 
curried then my generic function always has "one" argument, the tuple 
of arguments to g and h, regardless of the size of the tuple.

So my function is
let f a b x = a x; b x;;

and a two argument "a" or "b" would be
let a x = match x with (i,j) -> print_string ("i" ^ "j");;

and I can call it e.g.

f a a ("z","x");;

Thanks,

Quetzalcoatl Bradley
qbradley@blackfen.com

On Tuesday, September 17, 2002, at 01:40  AM, Noel Welsh wrote:

> You can't have multiple arity functions or tuples in
> O'Caml, but you can curry the functions before calling
> them which is how I'd solve your problem.  You want to
> write something like:
>
>  fun f g h a1 a2 b1 b2 =
>    g a1 a2 ; h b1 b2
>
> with varying numbers of a and b.  Instead you can
> write:
>
>
>  fun f g h a1 b1 =
>     g a1; h b1
>
> and curry additional parameters when you call the
> function:
>
>  f (g a2) (h a2)
>
> This gets the same effect.  Alternatively you can use
> Scheme/Lisp which supports varying arity functions and
> has a handy apply function, for applying varying
> numbers of arguments to a function.
>
> Noel
> --- Quetzalcoatl Bradley <qbradley@blackfen.com>
> wrote:
>> Suppose all the parameters were curried.  Unless I
>> could operate on
>> tuples like they were lists then I would still be in
>> the same boat.  I
>> suppose if there was a tuple->list conversion
>> function I could achieve
>> the effect I desire.  Is there such an operation?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Quetzalcoatl Bradley
>> qbradley@newheights.com
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! News - Today's headlines
> http://news.yahoo.com
>
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners

[Caml-list] mutually referencing compilation units

[Henri Dubois-Ferriere]

hello,
given the banality i'm guessing this question has been asked before .. but
i couldn't find any clear statement related to this inthe archive.

So:
Is the fact that two mutually referencing units can't be compiled
supposed to be a Good Thing? It seems to be a consequence of the fact that
order of .cmo's is relevant, and when that design decision was made i
guess the restriction it entailed on mutual reference was not considered
to be a problem.


Thanks

Henri DF

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners

[Caml-list] function polymorphic in number of arguments?

[Quetzalcoatl Bradley]

Is it possible to make a function of N arguments (3 or more), the first 
two are functions of N-2 arguments, and the function calls the first 
two functions passing its remaining arguments to each of the first two 
functions.  For example

let f1 x = print_string (x ^ "1\n");;
let f2 x = print_string (x ^ "2\n");;

let f a b x = ??? What goes here ???

f f1 f2 "abc";;

result in

abc1
abc2

The trick part is I want the same function f to work if I pass it f1 
and f2 of 2 arguments and pass 4 arguments to f, f1, f2, and two others 
that get passed to f1 and f2.

Thanks for your time,

Quetzalcoatl Bradley
qbradley@blackfen.com
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners

Re: [Caml-list] function polymorphic in number of arguments?

[Francois Thomasset]

> Is it possible to make a function of N arguments (3 or more), the first 
> two are functions of N-2 arguments, and the function calls the first 
> two functions passing its remaining arguments to each of the first two 
> functions.
Whar about this one :
let f a b =
  let g x = a x; b x
  in g;;

François Thomasset


-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners

Re: [Caml-list] function polymorphic in number of arguments?

[Francois Thomasset]

> > Is it possible to make a function of N arguments (3 or more), the first 
> > two are functions of N-2 arguments, and the function calls the first 
> > two functions passing its remaining arguments to each of the first two 
> > functions.
> What about this one :
> let f a b =
>   let g x = a x; b x
>   in g;;
> 
> François Thomasset
> 
Sorry I am wrong : my proposal accepts f f1 f2 "abc",
but fails on f g1 g2 "abc" "def"
FT


-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners