From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F6687F026 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 16:06:00 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,316,1454972400"; d="scan'208";a="207048034" Received: from meleze.ens.fr (HELO [129.199.99.114]) ([129.199.99.114]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA; 10 Mar 2016 16:05:57 +0100 To: caml-list@inria.fr References: From: Francois Berenger Message-ID: <56E18D54.2010306@inria.fr> Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 16:05:56 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Tensorflow bindings for OCaml On 03/10/2016 03:19 AM, Milo Davis wrote: > Are there Tensorflow bindings for OCaml? I've looked around the > internet and can't find any, but I'd like to double check before trying > to build my own. If not, does anyone have any suggestions for an > alternative framework for neural networks in OCaml? Recently, I was looking for some Kohonen Self Organizing Map (SOM) library in OCaml and I didn't find one. In opam, it looks like there is nothing related to neural networks or I missed it. This smells like a bad news (as in "nothing mature out there"). It looks like I will have to use R the day I really need to use SOM maps. Here is what I found however: https://code.google.com/archive/p/ocaml-onnt/ http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/neurocaml/src/?root=neurocaml Article 71 in the OCaml Journal (not free, unfortunately): http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_journal/index.html An interesting e-mail but with dead links: http://caml.inria.fr/pub/ml-archives/caml-list/1997\/10/e3746cfab892fc757d0d8abcbcc13420.fr.html If we had at least some bindings in opam to a high quality neural networks library, that would be useful to several people ... -- Regards, Francois. "When in doubt, use more types"