From: Daniil Baturin <daniil@baturin.org>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] We need a rich standard library distributed with OCaml, really
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 14:20:35 +0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55DEC853.6080507@baturin.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150827080744.GA1542@pl-59055.rocqadm.inria.fr>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
It often provokes exact same feelings as OCaml standard library,
especially the prelude. There are also reimplementations of it, e.g.
https://hackage.haskell.org/package/classy-prelude
GHC authors also keep the old stuff for backwards compatibility.
What I think can serve as a source of inspiration is the Haskell
Platform or the Python distribution. They are distributed with a set of
more or less self-contained modules that once were or still are
third-party libraries. This is especially convenient on platforms not
friendly to automatic package management.
On 08/27/2015 02:07 PM, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for having started this thread.
>
> I am wondering to which extent the standard library of a language such
> as Haskell could be a source of inspiration for OCaml?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Sébastien.
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=Fpx0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-27 8:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-27 2:52 Hongbo Zhang
2015-08-27 6:59 ` Christoph Höger
2015-08-27 7:18 ` Anthony Tavener
2015-08-27 8:17 ` Gabriel Scherer
2015-08-27 10:35 ` Romain Bardou
2015-08-27 19:55 ` Martin DeMello
2015-08-27 20:10 ` Yotam Barnoy
2015-08-27 23:24 ` Drup
2015-08-28 13:23 ` Philippe Veber
2015-08-27 20:17 ` Raoul Duke
2015-08-27 23:10 ` Martin Jambon
[not found] ` <20150827174554.14858.6618@localhost>
2015-08-27 18:42 ` [Caml-list] Fwd: " Emmanuel Surleau
2015-08-27 21:17 ` [Caml-list] " Paolo Donadeo
2015-08-27 21:51 ` Oliver Bandel
2015-08-27 21:56 ` Oliver Bandel
2015-08-27 22:04 ` Oliver Bandel
2015-08-28 0:50 ` Hongbo Zhang
2015-08-31 16:06 ` Stéphane Glondu
2015-08-31 16:14 ` Francois Berenger
2015-08-31 16:44 ` Hendrik Boom
2015-08-31 18:04 ` Ian Zimmerman
2015-08-31 17:26 ` Stéphane Glondu
2015-09-01 15:06 ` Anil Madhavapeddy
2015-08-31 17:34 ` Oliver Bandel
2015-09-01 13:46 ` Gabriel Scherer
2015-08-27 8:07 ` Sébastien Hinderer
2015-08-27 8:20 ` Daniil Baturin [this message]
2015-08-27 9:34 ` Edouard Evangelisti
2015-08-28 9:07 ` r.3
2015-08-27 8:12 ` Francois Berenger
2015-08-27 11:57 ` Drup
2015-08-27 14:17 ` Yaron Minsky
2015-08-27 16:00 ` Jesse Haber-Kucharsky
2015-08-28 0:33 ` Hongbo Zhang
2015-08-28 1:53 ` Daniel Bünzli
[not found] ` <20150828.140826.2157566405742612169.Christophe.Troestler@umons.ac.be>
2015-08-28 12:38 ` Thomas Braibant
2015-08-28 13:00 ` [Caml-list] opam license field (was Re: We need a rich standard library distributed with OCaml, really) Daniel Bünzli
2015-08-28 13:06 ` David Sheets
2015-08-28 14:01 ` [Caml-list] We need a rich standard library distributed with OCaml, really Oliver Bandel
2015-08-31 15:26 ` Hendrik Boom
2015-08-28 14:35 ` Alain Frisch
2015-08-29 19:02 ` David MENTRÉ
2015-08-31 12:37 ` Jon Harrop
2015-08-31 15:05 ` Emmanuel Surleau
2015-08-31 17:31 ` Oliver Bandel
2015-08-28 15:02 ` Simon Cruanes
2015-08-28 15:27 ` Gabriel Scherer
2015-08-28 15:51 ` Oliver Bandel
2015-08-31 18:40 ` Ashish Agarwal
2016-03-27 20:54 ` Jon Harrop
2016-03-27 21:21 ` Simon Cruanes
2016-03-27 23:48 ` Yaron Minsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55DEC853.6080507@baturin.org \
--to=daniil@baturin.org \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox