From: "Mr. Herr" <misterherr@freenet.de>
To: Caml List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OPAM 1.2.1
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 20:52:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5515B4F8.3070205@freenet.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMu2m2LydS9TcK1vaDDhJLKNn=OrkvVed5dYABxz3TafyRmZSA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3635 bytes --]
Hm, top-posting?
Okay, so we have hieroglyph graphics in 1.2.1, and the update of the local opam
directories is terse , and everything is fine.
I would have voted against the unicode graphics, they are not enough self explaining
(I admit though using ✓ in my scripts).
While we are at it: opam has become a well working, very reliable package manager on
*nix systems, thank you.
/Str.
On 27.03.2015 19:54, Ashish Agarwal wrote:
> There is no error. The update seems to have succeeded. An "update" only updates the
> metadata information, and doesn't actually upgrade any of your packages. To upgrade
> your packages, you can now type "opam upgrade" as the message printed out states.
never with dubious binaries... :-)
>
> What you're referring to as heiroglyphs, I see as rather nice usage of unicode
> characters to represent useful information.
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Mr. Herr <misterherr@freenet.de
> <mailto:misterherr@freenet.de>> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 27.03.2015 19 <tel:27.03.2015%2019>:09, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
>
> On 27 Mar 2015, at 18:00, Mr. Herr <misterherr@freenet.de
> <mailto:misterherr@freenet.de>> wrote:
>
>
> the 1.2.1 binary from https://github.com/ocaml/opam/releases/tag/1.2.1,
> as well as the compile result of
> opam-full-1.2.1.tar.gz are behaving strange on my opensuse 1.3.1.
>
> All I did was to replace the 1.2.0 binaries with the 1.2.1 version.
>
> Here a console log where 'opam' is /usr/local/bin/opam-1.2.1-x86_64-Linux
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> strobel@s131-intel:/data/lvmvol/strobel-sources> opam update
>
> =-=- Updating package repositories
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> [default] synchronized from https://opam.ocaml.org
>
> Updates available for 4.02.1, apply them with 'opam upgrade':
> ===== ↻ 1 ↗ 1 =====
> strobel@s131-intel:/data/lvmvol> opam-1.2.0-x86_64-Linux update
> [default] Downloading https://opam.ocaml.org/urls.txt
> Updating /opt/opam/repo/compiler-index ...
> Updating /opt/opam/compilers/ ...
> Updating /opt/opam/repo/package-index ...
> Updating /opt/opam/packages/ ...
>
> Updates available for 4.02.1, apply them with 'opam upgrade':
> === 1 to reinstall | 1 to upgrade ===
> strobel@s131-intel:/data/lvmvol>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> What can I do to debug this?
>
> I'm not sure if I've missed something obvious, since you haven't specified
> what you think has gone wrong. You appear to have typed in "opam update" twice.
>
> Either do "opam update -u" (which updates the package sets and upgrades
> them), or "opam update && opam upgrade".
>
>
> the output from the 1.2.0 version is there for reference, this is what I have
> come to expect.
>
> The 1.2.1 binary is not doing the same checks, and outputs hieroglyphs - very
> dubious.
>
> /Str
>
>
>
> --
> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives:
> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 7317 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-27 19:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-24 3:08 [Caml-list] [ANN] " Louis Gesbert
2015-03-27 18:00 ` [Caml-list] " Mr. Herr
2015-03-27 18:09 ` Anil Madhavapeddy
2015-03-27 18:29 ` Mr. Herr
2015-03-27 18:52 ` Stefan Schmiedl
2015-03-27 18:54 ` Ashish Agarwal
2015-03-27 19:52 ` Mr. Herr [this message]
2015-03-27 20:24 ` Daniel Bünzli
2015-03-28 7:06 ` Louis Gesbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5515B4F8.3070205@freenet.de \
--to=misterherr@freenet.de \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox