From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <matthieu.dubuget@gmail.com>
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE4D57FA8B
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:54:49 +0100 (CET)
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  matthieu.dubuget@gmail.com) identity=pra;
  client-ip=74.125.82.46;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="matthieu.dubuget@gmail.com";
  x-sender="matthieu.dubuget@gmail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of
  matthieu.dubuget@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.46 as
  permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=74.125.82.46;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="matthieu.dubuget@gmail.com";
  x-sender="matthieu.dubuget@gmail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@mail-wg0-f46.google.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=74.125.82.46;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="matthieu.dubuget@gmail.com";
  x-sender="postmaster@mail-wg0-f46.google.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CVAQCeaxFVmy5SfUpcg1hagxDDOoVzgUFMAQEBAQEBEQEBAQEBBgsLCRQuQQEBg1MEDAcRCAcBBQgBGxwCAwEREA8CBRYLAgsDAgECAREMAQQBBQEDASsIAQEeh3gBAQIJCAQBnx+DLD4xizGBawSCc4FxjSgKGQQKGQ1UhSABBQ6BE48TglKBRQWUP4YAgVWFLoEHilg1Rk+EEW6CQwEBAQ
X-IPAS-Result: A0CVAQCeaxFVmy5SfUpcg1hagxDDOoVzgUFMAQEBAQEBEQEBAQEBBgsLCRQuQQEBg1MEDAcRCAcBBQgBGxwCAwEREA8CBRYLAgsDAgECAREMAQQBBQEDASsIAQEeh3gBAQIJCAQBnx+DLD4xizGBawSCc4FxjSgKGQQKGQ1UhSABBQ6BE48TglKBRQWUP4YAgVWFLoEHilg1Rk+EEW6CQwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,458,1422918000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="129883675"
Received: from mail-wg0-f46.google.com ([74.125.82.46])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 24 Mar 2015 14:54:49 +0100
Received: by wgdm6 with SMTP id m6so171853504wgd.2
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 06:54:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=8p/Lm7NpdzOAnOsCHJT9RZKSCanHZwvDmCw89xRKJ2c=;
        b=iEMW+qw1bFuCC6K6pOWt4kOwi7uzxuuyUgPabntLN4MjaAvl+UQFfSBmW5QwoHjvI7
         r8T7fAw3OdNJTxcsTujwQksLhUb5Ci4/DJH6Gq1h0sfzHgBVZiXAwoPdFWsHtHDkDdhq
         s4IUk9qbOES3hmKCcLlO5ZN5sCF7BpRWIxkgIZO9vMvvUGFfqsfBrOylDIqLo/5QxgZ7
         anK6yvRuJIDkRqpVrgbZx9IVef1tJc7JdjC3DLWA3eSLIyRJVm8S3SlXhrGESx6vBk0b
         fXjUfuSKy8DPem/VcJgHZYrgJbIJ8NjqlecLLeLTDD2TGzuuk46MCywEnfYkOwJhrQgp
         nxuA==
X-Received: by 10.194.47.201 with SMTP id f9mr8036390wjn.17.1427205289361;
        Tue, 24 Mar 2015 06:54:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.17.1.47] (papillon.metalscan.fr. [178.22.148.54])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ps4sm6202597wjc.31.2015.03.24.06.54.48
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>
        (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Tue, 24 Mar 2015 06:54:48 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <55116CA7.2000800@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:54:47 +0100
From: Matthieu Dubuget <matthieu.dubuget@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Matthieu Dubuget <matthieu.dubuget@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: [Caml-list] Is there a 64 bits Native MinGW port?

Hello,

in the README.win32 file of the last OCaml release, four ports are listed.

>                                       Native MS     Native 
> MinGW        Cygwin
>
> 64 bits?                            Win32 or Win64    Win32 only      
> Win32 only

Are there any problem with a 64 bits native MinGW port?

Thanks for any explanation

Salutations

-- 
Matthieu Dubuget
Guide d’autodéfense numérique : http://guide.boum.org