From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <frederic.bour@lakaban.net>
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55F097FC86
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 18:16:52 +0100 (CET)
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  frederic.bour@lakaban.net) identity=pra;
  client-ip=213.251.185.180;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="frederic.bour@lakaban.net";
  x-sender="frederic.bour@lakaban.net";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of
  frederic.bour@lakaban.net designates 213.251.185.180 as
  permitted sender) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=213.251.185.180;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="frederic.bour@lakaban.net";
  x-sender="frederic.bour@lakaban.net";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@mail.lakaban.net) identity=helo;
  client-ip=213.251.185.180;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="frederic.bour@lakaban.net";
  x-sender="postmaster@mail.lakaban.net";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CpBAC0AwtV/7S5+9VchDKDDckOAoIYAQEBAQEBfYQQAQUjDwEFCAEBNgIPCxgCAgUWCwICCQMCAQIBRRMIAQGIL7FDcIRiAQWXGAwaBoEhiXaEeBaCUoFFoT6NJSKDb26CQwEBAQ
X-IPAS-Result: A0CpBAC0AwtV/7S5+9VchDKDDckOAoIYAQEBAQEBfYQQAQUjDwEFCAEBNgIPCxgCAgUWCwICCQMCAQIBRRMIAQGIL7FDcIRiAQWXGAwaBoEhiXaEeBaCUoFFoT6NJSKDb26CQwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,430,1422918000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="104023930"
Received: from pepper.lakaban.net (HELO mail.lakaban.net) ([213.251.185.180])
  by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 19 Mar 2015 18:16:51 +0100
Received: from [192.168.0.27] (81-64-217-164.rev.numericable.fr [81.64.217.164])
	(Authenticated sender: defre@ygg-drasil.fr)
	by mail.lakaban.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 86B7A3C43CF
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 17:10:56 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lakaban.net;
	s=default; t=1426785056;
	bh=vu39uaA8sTAWPtUxtpqoaaQZKqfRpEUyYTOHmJ1zuwo=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From;
	b=SfpnO33dFCoXOgs7mxMjvxLX0Ubqm1a8XrtBSKGTjq3YEakrJkANxMmzjBa2jok6q
	 7XfPog7CpKmg499K9hAA4E3N3tddS8B1KdPqqtOuuYtsweO9HDmOCR7jRipHt2uZ0p
	 5FBVqszioD7wUdzDq7xAslNMpA/xDDDQ9r/1z8fk=
Message-ID: <550B0441.6010801@lakaban.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 18:15:45 +0100
From: =?UTF-8?B?RnLDqWTDqXJpYyBCb3Vy?= <frederic.bour@lakaban.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: caml-list@inria.fr
References: <2AB388B4D07D4DDABA30298A7C890319@erratique.ch> <CAKR7PS_K5A5XR0nDnMv4z23LjxGBoi299vKY3+fccd1HuSEM-A@mail.gmail.com> <596DAEC11B474882835CEA10AAACE35E@erratique.ch> <CAKR7PS_fFML9gvqF1Zr0qa+2uEMUg4FQfp2f9gXuhN1Ee7_n=A@mail.gmail.com> <A9833AA6DB2C40058D2E66B6A381E599@erratique.ch> <CAAxsn=FDU-24dbK2xHm0n8BOSPJgZ+xzZF=kOytoM8ed9ak7Vw@mail.gmail.com> <87E7B1EBF3144E7C844448D0F5EBB407@erratique.ch> <CAKR7PS8DuLUgs7YvDii2te8uhZ9DgpU7NnUNzyUmOnrmN-b_zA@mail.gmail.com> <20ABBB1C7E4B44E083BECF14EB99E72F@erratique.ch>
In-Reply-To: <20ABBB1C7E4B44E083BECF14EB99E72F@erratique.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] GADT existential escape

Indeed, open variants can have type parameters.
But exceptions really are sugar over a non-parameterized open variant.

On 19/03/2015 18:14, Daniel Bünzli wrote:
> Le jeudi, 19 mars 2015 à 17:46, Milan Stanojević a écrit :
>> Exceptions and open variants are actually exactly the same.
> Well apparently not. It seems that open variants are more expressive.
>
> Daniel
>
>
>