From: Alain Frisch <alain@frisch.fr>
To: oleg@okmij.org, jun.furuse@gmail.com, caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [ANN] ppx_monadic.1.0.2, ppx for monadic do,
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:34:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54BCC17A.4000802@frisch.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150119073303.038ECC38BA@www1.g3.pair.com>
On 01/19/2015 08:33 AM, oleg@okmij.org wrote:
>> Current OCaml syntax has shortage of pattern binding expression and
>> only usable is let%xxx p = e in which is a bit pain for ppx writers.
>
> Indeed. One may wish that
>
> let rec p = e1 in e2
>
> were treated as if it were
> let[@ocaml.let "rec"] p = e1 in e2
>
> and likewise let module.
Please, no! Attributes are intended to add meta-data for external tools
(ppx, tools parsing .cmt files, etc), perhaps also to tweak the behavior
of the compiler (trigger/control warnings, etc), certainly not to encode
core language features (otherwise, let's use s-expressions instead of
Parsetree). Facilitating language experiments is also a good use for
attributes, but not as a long-term solution for the official compiler.
> Come to think of it, 'rec! or 'module' are
> annotations on let.
"let module" has a different shape (module
identifiers/types/expressions) than "let". And it doesn't seem
realistic to merge, say, core types and module types, or core
expressions and module expressions.
Alain
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-19 8:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-13 14:23 [Caml-list] [ANN] ppx_monadic.1.0.2, ppx for monadic do, pattern guards and monadic comprehension Jun Furuse
2015-01-14 8:40 ` [Caml-list] [ANN] ppx_monadic.1.0.2, ppx for monadic do, pattern oleg
2015-01-18 14:47 ` Jun Furuse
2015-01-19 7:33 ` [Caml-list] [ANN] ppx_monadic.1.0.2, ppx for monadic do, oleg
2015-01-19 8:34 ` Alain Frisch [this message]
2015-01-19 9:06 ` Gabriel Scherer
2015-01-19 9:40 ` Alain Frisch
2015-01-19 16:10 ` Jeremy Yallop
2015-01-19 8:56 ` [Caml-list] [ANN] ppx_monadic.1.0.2, ppx for monadic do, pattern Alain Frisch
2015-01-19 21:52 ` Drup
2015-01-20 3:53 ` Jun Furuse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54BCC17A.4000802@frisch.fr \
--to=alain@frisch.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=jun.furuse@gmail.com \
--cc=oleg@okmij.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox