From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <helmut.brandl@gmx.net>
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FE997F02D
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 17:19:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  helmut.brandl@gmx.net) identity=pra; client-ip=212.227.17.21;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="helmut.brandl@gmx.net";
  x-sender="helmut.brandl@gmx.net";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of
  helmut.brandl@gmx.net designates 212.227.17.21 as permitted
  sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=212.227.17.21;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="helmut.brandl@gmx.net";
  x-sender="helmut.brandl@gmx.net";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@mout.gmx.net) identity=helo;
  client-ip=212.227.17.21;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="helmut.brandl@gmx.net";
  x-sender="postmaster@mout.gmx.net";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkwBAMgmRVTU4xEVnGdsb2JhbABcg2GDXsknh00CgREWAREBAQEBAQYNCQkULoQDAQEEIxVAEQsYAgIFFgsCAgkDAgECAUUTCAEBiCYBFgIJpTeLYY0eAYcIAQEBBwEBAQEaBIEsjQ6CHhaCYYFUBYtihyWDP457kk+DGQEBAQ
X-IPAS-Result: AkwBAMgmRVTU4xEVnGdsb2JhbABcg2GDXsknh00CgREWAREBAQEBAQYNCQkULoQDAQEEIxVAEQsYAgIFFgsCAgkDAgECAUUTCAEBiCYBFgIJpTeLYY0eAYcIAQEBBwEBAQEaBIEsjQ6CHhaCYYFUBYtihyWDP457kk+DGQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,756,1406584800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="102071654"
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 20 Oct 2014 17:19:22 +0200
Received: from [192.168.1.77] ([187.233.120.106]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103)
 with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MCL6r-1Xoj3A07vt-009867; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 17:19:21
 +0200
Message-ID: <544527F5.5080105@gmx.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 10:19:17 -0500
From: Helmut Brandl <helmut.brandl@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: caml-list@inria.fr
References: <5445153E.7010203@gmx.net> <544518F1.4050907@inria.fr> <544519B6.6050007@gmx.net> <54451A2A.6010300@inria.fr> <54451FB0.3080303@gmx.net> <5445212C.5030102@coherentgraphics.co.uk> <544522A9.90407@gmx.net> <54452588.2060606@inria.fr>
In-Reply-To: <54452588.2060606@inria.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID:  V03:K0:VYChUB7DqrQ8JXfL241OwMIutXbx9ExxcIFcs1I5nzow9rjzLhF
 UWV/nsNvFR0R1xVUcl6YG+xD3MbjOApwd5f9FZ5mshTAYx6cluewcf0X2JTQMXXOmjwxyTf
 NOxpuEmaRu/GPWI+YGc+ymaqFk4L5gXCMTwgN4xs6D/oxUJvmax7OoInMW2B12GWuOUhIGk
 S5xjX6LWwcUU62vLztJTQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Errors in installing 'lwt'

How do I install ocaml by opam? The command 'opam install ocaml' does 
not work.

What is the difference? My ocaml system works fine and I don't want to 
compromise it because I need it. Can 2 versions of ocaml coexist without 
any interference?

On 10/20/2014 10:08 AM, Francois Berenger wrote:
> As a workaround, I would recommend having a fresh ocaml installed by 
> opam.
>
> It always work nicer in this way, in my experience (I use the ocaml
> installed by opam switching, not the one installed system-wide).
>
> On 10/20/2014 04:56 PM, Helmut Brandl wrote:
>> My platform is the 32bit version of the archlinux distribution on x86. I
>> have got the ocaml base installation and opam via the distribution and
>> tried to install packages via 'opam install ...'.
>>
>> Everything went fine until 'opam' tried to install 'lwt'.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/20/2014 09:50 AM, John Whitington wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Helmut Brandl wrote:
>>>> Does not work either. 'opam' reinstalls 'camlp4' without any problems
>>>> but then fails installing 'lwt'.
>>>
>>> You haven't mentioned what platform you're using. There's a known
>>> issue on OS X with 2.4.6, for example:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/ocsigen/lwt/issues/91
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>
>