From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 506D87F02D for ; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 14:50:37 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of elfring@users.sourceforge.net) identity=pra; client-ip=212.227.15.4; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="elfring@users.sourceforge.net"; x-sender="elfring@users.sourceforge.net"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of elfring@users.sourceforge.net) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=212.227.15.4; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="elfring@users.sourceforge.net"; x-sender="elfring@users.sourceforge.net"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mout.web.de) identity=helo; client-ip=212.227.15.4; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="elfring@users.sourceforge.net"; x-sender="postmaster@mout.web.de"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjkBAJSyQ1TU4w8EnGdsb2JhbABb2BEKAoEOFgERAQEBAQEGDQkJFC6EAwEBAwF4AQULCw4TFg8JAwIBAgFFBg0BBwEBiDMMvw4BAQEBBgEBAQEBHZBRB4RLAQSdWYdQEwWSM4M1AQEB X-IPAS-Result: AjkBAJSyQ1TU4w8EnGdsb2JhbABb2BEKAoEOFgERAQEBAQEGDQkJFC6EAwEBAwF4AQULCw4TFg8JAwIBAgFFBg0BBwEBiDMMvw4BAQEBBgEBAQEBHZBRB4RLAQSdWYdQEwWSM4M1AQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,749,1406584800"; d="scan'208";a="83818856" Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 19 Oct 2014 14:50:36 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([92.227.60.33]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MGARb-1XtGDE0xcN-00FENH; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 14:50:35 +0200 Message-ID: <5443B399.5080209@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 14:50:33 +0200 From: SF Markus Elfring User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roelof Wobben CC: caml-list@inria.fr References: <5443A96B.5010505@home.nl> In-Reply-To: <5443A96B.5010505@home.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:iYgUzCJcIcNZqwxRTfFVpMgI4W1bNHsu4A+w1D8IVp1hCRQIRHK wv+Y7CxR+T8L5YZG+MLFejxrbYROM7mHDPgXBHUQjnzMUX04bJYjPLNIkHOKPMEC96MH6ik SNroQ0x7jc0wEyw5ZnS57uFJ0Cb0/JQKcqKVqnB5OLbQ6HSOGdWWGDn4x7R49IkY1ShIlGD BNEWu1liQXaRjuObaIMXA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Subject: Re: [Caml-list] reverse a list > Now I try to reverse a list. Would you like to compare the run time properties for different approaches? 1. Use of immutable data structures in the functional programming style 2. Manage a list as a mutable member of a class in an "imperative" and object-oriented programming style Regards, Markus