From: Jonathan Protzenko <jonathan.protzenko@gmail.com>
To: caml users <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: [Caml-list] Feedback wanted about the OCaml windows installer
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 18:24:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53F61D38.5020704@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
Following Damien's announcement of a new rc-candidate, I set out to
refresh the OCaml installer for windows and realized that I could use
some feedback.
The installer currently distributes:
- ocaml, with native and bytecode compilers
- flexlink
- findlib
- "ocamlwin", the infamous windows top-level,
- camlp4
- labltk
Please note that this is not enough to compile native programs, as an
external assembly tool ("as") is required, so without any extras, the
user can only use the top-level, and perform byte-code compilation.
Please note that, even though labltk is distributed, run-time support
libraries are needed for tk programs to run.
The installer currently:
- offers the option of installing cygwin along with enough packages to
have a working toolchain, including the "as" tool;
- offers the option of downloading and setting up emacs, along with the
official caml-mode, and setting up the right file associations (ml and
mli) in the windows explorer;
- offers the option of downloading activetcl to make sure tools such as
ocamlbrowser and the labltk libraries work properly.
I am considering:
- dropping "ocamlwin": it is old, buggy, and better replacements are now
available;
- optionally installing OCamlTop to provide a much-needed replacement
for "ocamlwin";
- dropping labltk along with the option for downloading activetcl: this
requires extra effort on my side because it now is distributed as a
separate project, and I suspect people who are serious about user
interfaces are using lablgtk, but I'd be interested in hearing your
opinion about this;
- keeping camlp4 even though it moved off into a separate project
- refreshing emacs to the latest version
- bundling Merlin binaries so that they can be installed along with
Emacs, if the user is so inclined.
I don't have a good understanding of the current user base of the
installer; so if you're a user of this installer, I'd be interested in
hearing your story. Is a good top-level important because you're in
education? Have you ever used labltk? Are you proficient enough to
download, say, odb (which, last time I checked, more or less worked on
Windows), and install the missing packages yourself?
Looking forward to your comments,
~ jonathan
next reply other threads:[~2014-08-21 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-21 16:24 Jonathan Protzenko [this message]
2014-09-01 16:34 ` Romain Bardou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53F61D38.5020704@gmail.com \
--to=jonathan.protzenko@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox