From: "Török Edwin" <edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OpenGL and LWT
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 12:34:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5326CFA2.909@etorok.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANhEzE4k5unUmDbT+1GsC8BQnt7LPt2QSdM=_joa6d6BKdETUA@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/17/2014 12:09 PM, Jeremie Dimino wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Richard Neswold <rich.neswold@gmail.com <mailto:rich.neswold@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> What would be the appropriate way to use LWT and LabGL together?
>
> My gut feeling would be to have the core model and logic to be LWT with a 'detached' thread executing the OpenGL main loop. The thread would get events through the reactive module and would update the display accordingly.
>
> The problem is I'm still trying to wrap my head around LWT and I'm not sure a detached thread can participate with the LWT environment it was spawned from. It appears the detached thread is supposed to do something and eventually return a value.
>
>
> Yes, the purpose of Lwt_preemptive.detach is to execute a blocking action in a separate system thread in order not to block all lwt threads. And from another system thread you cannot run lwt code directly, you have to use Lwt_preemptive.run_in_main.
Be careful to have an OpenGL context set as current on the thread(s) from which you make GL calls. See:
https://www.opengl.org/wiki/OpenGL_and_multithreading
http://www.equalizergraphics.com/documentation/parallelOpenGLFAQ.html
I don't think you'll get a performance improvement from launching multiple GL calls in different (Lwt) threads.
>
>
> Is the correct approach to use a detached thread to make the individual OpenGL calls?
>
>
> I think that would be very slow, as in involves system thread synchronization.
>
>
> Any recommendations or resources on the subject would be appreciated.
>
>
> You could try to assume that OpenGL calls are fast and perform them in the same thread as lwt.
Well there are a few that are slow, like swapping buffers which can wait for vsync.
I think its best to make GL calls from just *one* thread, either your application's main thread, or a dedicated rendering thread.
You can probably build a Lwt.t that waits for the rendering thread to finish one frame using
Lwt_unix.make_notification/send_notification for thread-safe Lwt notification, coupled with Lwt.wait/Lwt.wakeup_result.
Best regards,
--Edwin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-17 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-15 17:37 Richard Neswold
2014-03-17 10:09 ` Jeremie Dimino
2014-03-17 10:32 ` Ivan Gotovchits
2014-03-17 13:39 ` Rich Neswold
2014-03-17 14:05 ` Daniel Bünzli
2014-03-17 14:13 ` Daniel Bünzli
2014-03-17 22:50 ` Richard Neswold
2014-03-17 23:50 ` Daniel Bünzli
2014-03-19 12:01 ` Rich Neswold
2014-03-17 10:34 ` Török Edwin [this message]
2014-03-17 11:01 ` Daniel Bünzli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5326CFA2.909@etorok.net \
--to=edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox