From: Matej Kosik <5764c029b688c1c0d24a2e97cd764f@gmail.com>
To: caml-list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: [Caml-list] semaphore puzzle
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 19:30:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5249C348.9070408@gmail.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1000 bytes --]
Hi,
I am trying to find the most simple and, if possible, clean way to synchronize my threads.
In this particular case, semaphores would be ideal
(alternatively, unbounded channels)
(* Create a new semaphore with a given initial value. *)
val create : int -> t
(* V *)
val up : t -> unit
(* P *)
val down : t -> unit
val try_down : t -> bool
The "down" or "try_down" are almost the solutions, but not quite.
"down" may block forever ---> there is no timeout at all
(I need some)
"try_down" ---> the timeout is zero
(I prefer a non-zero timeout)
Obviously, I could use "try_down" in a loop, checking the system time myself and then either give up or actually manage to decrement the semaphore.
Is there a better solution than this?
(There is a Unix module, there are signals, but I am not sure whether it is safe to use them in multithreaded program.
At least, I did not have a luck.)
Thanks in advance for patience &| help.
[-- Attachment #2: semaphore.ml --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1075 bytes --]
exception Timeout
type t = {mutex : Mutex.t;
condition_lock : Condition.t;
mutable value : int}
let create initial_value =
assert (0 <= initial_value);
{mutex = Mutex.create ();
condition_lock = Condition.create ();
value = initial_value}
let up semaphore =
Mutex.lock semaphore.mutex;
semaphore.value <- succ semaphore.value;
Mutex.unlock semaphore.mutex;
Condition.signal semaphore.condition_lock
let down semaphore =
Mutex.lock semaphore.mutex;
assert (0 <= semaphore.value);
while semaphore.value = 0 do
Condition.wait semaphore.condition_lock semaphore.mutex
done;
semaphore.value <- pred semaphore.value;
Mutex.unlock semaphore.mutex
(* If it is possible to decrement the semaphore, do it and return "true".
Otherwise return "false". *)
let try_down semaphore =
Mutex.lock semaphore.mutex;
if 0 < semaphore.value then
begin
semaphore.value <- pred semaphore.value;
Mutex.unlock semaphore.mutex;
true
end
else
begin
Mutex.unlock semaphore.mutex;
false
end
next reply other threads:[~2013-09-30 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-30 18:30 Matej Kosik [this message]
2013-10-01 11:30 ` Gerd Stolpmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5249C348.9070408@gmail.com \
--to=5764c029b688c1c0d24a2e97cd764f@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox