From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3E707EE4B for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:18:29 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net) identity=pra; client-ip=176.9.138.55; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net"; x-sender="edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net designates 176.9.138.55 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=176.9.138.55; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net"; x-sender="edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of postmaster@mail.etorok.net designates 176.9.138.55 as permitted sender) identity=helo; client-ip=176.9.138.55; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net"; x-sender="postmaster@mail.etorok.net"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgIFAIszSVKwCYo3/2dsb2JhbABagwfCBIEnFnSCJQEBBUABATYCDwsYCRYPCQMCAQIBRRMIAogGqT2EUAEFjiQGj1gWhAyJNo5MhjOLRoFmgUE X-IPAS-Result: AgIFAIszSVKwCYo3/2dsb2JhbABagwfCBIEnFnSCJQEBBUABATYCDwsYCRYPCQMCAQIBRRMIAogGqT2EUAEFjiQGj1gWhAyJNo5MhjOLRoFmgUE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,1006,1371074400"; d="scan'208";a="28516120" Received: from mail.etorok.net ([176.9.138.55]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 30 Sep 2013 10:18:27 +0200 Received: from [172.30.42.25] (unknown [79.114.31.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.etorok.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CCE3846D8 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:18:25 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=etorok.net; s=mailout; t=1380529105; bh=igrRXJzQkmj3DoXv6v6EFWgmeZ/A5DSYix/4Bi8WzkQ=; l=969; h=Date:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=eZ1dFvYP6zIDDvUNYrAIkbsSaRedBfZbLUSfR354E1xb02OurztWFQdjnbJUaGLDn 2vMoRYSq6w+FsC/qE3ROgb3uSkbYnc8NL2sWS0uzNcUiZLRBFX93qtni9eAd1no6z5 mAmXp3IpNb12tHmUMzow8HcixqHm0IaTdReJNRzg= Message-ID: <524933CF.4000709@etorok.net> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 11:18:23 +0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?T=F6r=F6k_Edwin?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130922 Icedove/17.0.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@inria.fr References: <5229DEF9.7040706@inria.fr> <5229F284.5050806@inria.fr> <5249310F.7090108@riken.jp> In-Reply-To: <5249310F.7090108@riken.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.8 at mail X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [Caml-list] from oasis to obuild (original subject was Re: Accelerating compilation) On 09/30/2013 11:06 AM, Francois Berenger wrote: > On 09/07/2013 05:51 AM, Fabrice Le Fessant wrote: >> [...] >> FWIW, I recently compiled Merlin with both ocamlbuild and ocp-build, >> on a quad-core with "-j 10" for both (the link to the ocp-build >> description file is in the latest OCamlPro's report), ocamlbuild needs >> 13s where ocp-build only needs 4s to compile everything. > > I recently switched from oasis to obuild. > > The main reason I adopted oasis in the past is because the project > description file (_oasis) is very short. > > With ocp-build, (as far as I know) I would have to list all the files > my program/libraries need to be built, and I am too lazy for that. > > But now, I have a project.obuild file instead, which > is as terse as an _oasis file. obuild is more like CMake than automake, right? (i.e. it requires itself to be present at build time, and you can't pregenerate build files) Best regards, --Edwin