From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <alain@frisch.fr>
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 490477EE4A
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 16:51:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  alain@frisch.fr) identity=pra; client-ip=193.252.23.212;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="alain@frisch.fr"; x-sender="alain@frisch.fr";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  alain@frisch.fr) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=193.252.23.212;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="alain@frisch.fr"; x-sender="alain@frisch.fr";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@msa.smtpout.orange.fr) identity=helo;
  client-ip=193.252.23.212;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="alain@frisch.fr";
  x-sender="postmaster@msa.smtpout.orange.fr";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnEBANvUMVLB/BfUnGdsb2JhbABbwXWCfoExDgEBAQEBBhYJPIIlAQEFOEABEAsYCRYPCQMCAQIBRRMBBwEBiAK8LI9rBxaEBwOXeYYwjmc
X-IPAS-Result: AnEBANvUMVLB/BfUnGdsb2JhbABbwXWCfoExDgEBAQEBBhYJPIIlAQEFOEABEAsYCRYPCQMCAQIBRRMBBwEBiAK8LI9rBxaEBwOXeYYwjmc
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,891,1371074400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="26637191"
Received: from msa03.smtpout.orange.fr (HELO msa.smtpout.orange.fr) ([193.252.23.212])
  by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 12 Sep 2013 16:51:54 +0200
Received: from [192.168.1.112] ([92.151.61.120])
	by mwinf5d64 with ME
	id QErt1m00T2bfMm403ErurA; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 16:51:54 +0200
Message-ID: <5231D505.2020909@frisch.fr>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 16:51:49 +0200
From: Alain Frisch <alain@frisch.fr>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: jon@ffconsultancy.com
CC: caml-list@inria.fr
References: <20130910230928.2d51cd39@atmarama.noip.me>	<CAPzAKVCSHcYmiqb4BbDkjAnLUkMxTi5OYFYZAJ5YediFFBbv6Q@mail.gmail.com>	<20130911052437.GA9514@notk.org>	<20130911101457.3f756b68@atmarama.noip.me>	<20130911181737.GA3764@notk.org>	<054201ceaf2a$5a0ece10$0e2c6a30$@ffconsultancy.com> <CAN=ouMRLL7bR8W2Q=jzfMc24B8yyM+Q9Cb9ncwvsYobAuQzerA@mail.gmail.com> <05b701ceafc6$0dab7950$29026bf0$@ffconsultancy.com>
In-Reply-To: <05b701ceafc6$0dab7950$29026bf0$@ffconsultancy.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml vs Ada and/or GUI options

On 09/12/2013 04:40 PM, Jon Harrop wrote:
> OCaml is nowhere near
> having competitive support for basic features required for modern GUI
> programming

Hi Jon!

Could you more specific?  Are you referring to language features?

-- Alain