From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C13217EE51 for ; Wed, 29 May 2013 08:12:14 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of mihamina@rktmb.org) identity=pra; client-ip=217.70.183.196; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="mihamina@rktmb.org"; x-sender="mihamina@rktmb.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of mihamina@rktmb.org) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=217.70.183.196; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="mihamina@rktmb.org"; x-sender="mihamina@rktmb.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@relay4-d.mail.gandi.net) identity=helo; client-ip=217.70.183.196; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="mihamina@rktmb.org"; x-sender="postmaster@relay4-d.mail.gandi.net"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiUCAPSapVHZRrfEnGdsb2JhbABZhnSFXqRmig+HO4JogQcWDgEBAQEBBg0JCRQoggkRCQEBAQQjZgsDARQJIQICDwJGEwgBAYgHBgKpFZF4jxwWgiuBEwOJGY4ijgqGSIIk X-IPAS-Result: AiUCAPSapVHZRrfEnGdsb2JhbABZhnSFXqRmig+HO4JogQcWDgEBAQEBBg0JCRQoggkRCQEBAQQjZgsDARQJIQICDwJGEwgBAYgHBgKpFZF4jxwWgiuBEwOJGY4ijgqGSIIk X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,763,1363129200"; d="scan'208,217";a="19387880" Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 29 May 2013 08:12:14 +0200 Received: from mfilter23-d.gandi.net (mfilter23-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.151]) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A8181720A1 for ; Wed, 29 May 2013 08:12:14 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter23-d.gandi.net Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]) by mfilter23-d.gandi.net (mfilter23-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xf7wk6HmOuJk for ; Wed, 29 May 2013 08:12:12 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 41.188.46.121 Received: from mihamina-i5.mg.ideoneov.com (unknown [41.188.46.121]) (Authenticated sender: out@rktmb.org) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 401C3172098 for ; Wed, 29 May 2013 08:12:11 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <51A59C38.30805@rktmb.org> Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 09:12:08 +0300 From: Mihamina Rakotomandimby User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130402 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@inria.fr References: <20130523235355.GI6510@siouxsie> <20130526150008.GA2014@siouxsie> <20130526234911.41866xca7wgoirfb@webmail.in-berlin.de> <51A30E01.5070300@freenet.de> <20130527185345.e01a7733ac652f89f4e400f7@mega-nerd.com> <51A353BE.5030009@freenet.de> <51A40590.4090501@riken.jp> <20130528024413.GA4602@siouxsie> <51A4272F.8050803@riken.jp> <20130528123620.GA2013@siouxsie> In-Reply-To: <20130528123620.GA2013@siouxsie> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030602070901090704040904" Subject: Re: Problems to get larger user base ... (Re: [Caml-list] OCaml's variables) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030602070901090704040904 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2013-05-28 15:36, oliver wrote: > I also had the goal to attract people to OCaml, years ago. > Today it's not necessary to me to have more OCaml-prorammers around me. > I use OCaml for my own stuff, and if the jobs affords C, Perl, Python, > I possibly will mention OCaml, but don't dream about decision makers > really to adopt it. > I stopped dreaming about this issue. I keep hoping/dreaming my side :-) -- RMA. --------------030602070901090704040904 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 2013-05-28 15:36, oliver wrote:
I also had the goal to attract people to OCaml, years ago.
Today it's not necessary to me to have more OCaml-prorammers around me.
I use OCaml for my own stuff, and if the jobs affords C, Perl, Python,
I possibly will mention OCaml, but don't dream about decision makers
really to adopt it.
I stopped dreaming about this issue.

I keep hoping/dreaming my side :-)

-- 
RMA.
--------------030602070901090704040904--