From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <berenger@riken.jp>
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1851C7EE80
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 02:23:08 +0100 (CET)
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  berenger@riken.jp) identity=pra; client-ip=134.160.33.176;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="berenger@riken.jp";
  x-sender="berenger@riken.jp"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of
  berenger@riken.jp designates 134.160.33.176 as permitted
  sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=134.160.33.176;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="berenger@riken.jp";
  x-sender="berenger@riken.jp"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible;
  x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of
  postmaster@postman.riken.jp designates 134.160.33.176 as
  permitted sender) identity=helo; client-ip=134.160.33.176;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="berenger@riken.jp";
  x-sender="postmaster@postman.riken.jp";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: As8AABW9R1GGoCGwmWdsb2JhbABDxUCBdg4BAQEBAQgLCwcUKIIkAQEFJxFAEQsYCRYPCQMCAQIBDzYTBgIBARCHbgMPsjGGMQ2JW4xHglAWgyoDiHOMC4FghX2Fa4gz
X-IPAS-Result: As8AABW9R1GGoCGwmWdsb2JhbABDxUCBdg4BAQEBAQgLCwcUKIIkAQEFJxFAEQsYCRYPCQMCAQIBDzYTBgIBARCHbgMPsjGGMQ2JW4xHglAWgyoDiHOMC4FghX2Fa4gz
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,868,1355094000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="8210158"
Received: from postman4.riken.jp (HELO postman.riken.jp) ([134.160.33.176])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 19 Mar 2013 02:23:07 +0100
Received: from postman.riken.jp (postman4.riken.jp [127.0.0.1])
	by postman.riken.jp (Postfix) with SMTP id D26238280F8
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 10:23:05 +0900 (JST)
Received: from [172.27.98.103] (rikad98.riken.jp [134.160.214.98])
	by postman.riken.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A75917F803F
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 10:23:05 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <5147BDF9.8050003@riken.jp>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 10:23:05 +0900
From: Francois Berenger <berenger@riken.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: caml-list@inria.fr
References: <fa.e3jKyg6bl9+vTkPgypQ4ZRzEoos@ifi.uio.no> <86572c5b-3307-4f6f-be0b-c710b6291780@googlegroups.com> <878v5lca2c.fsf@li195-236.members.linode.com> <CAGmVoG15XvxWb9SEkV_uj3v7SwB4r9W0K9=8UDPVEEGghkDBoQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGmVoG15XvxWb9SEkV_uj3v7SwB4r9W0K9=8UDPVEEGghkDBoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-PMX-Version: 5.6.0.2009776, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2013.3.19.11223
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Haskell vs OCaml

On 03/18/2013 08:26 PM, Kakadu wrote:
> Please, don't feed the troll
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Malcolm Matalka <mmatalka@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The biggest advantage for me is Ocaml is simpler than Haskell IMO.
>>
>> adrian.alexander.may@gmail.com writes:
>>
>>> On Wednesday, 13 August 2008 20:49:17 UTC+8, circ ular  wrote:
>>>> What are the advantages/disadvantages when comparing OCaml to Haskell?
>>>
>>> case you of
>>>    man   -> haskell
>>>    mouse -> ocaml

Last time I used it, the Haskell "ecosystem" around the language
(tools and libraries) was quite advanced (they had an OPAM-like
long time ago for example).

Also, the population of Haskell programmers might be bigger
(bigger open-source community, easier to find programmers to hire).

F.