From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <berenger@riken.jp>
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 030BE7EE56
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 01:06:19 +0100 (CET)
Received-SPF: None (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  berenger@riken.jp) identity=pra; client-ip=134.160.33.175;
  receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="berenger@riken.jp";
  x-sender="berenger@riken.jp"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of
  berenger@riken.jp designates 134.160.33.175 as permitted
  sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=134.160.33.175;
  receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="berenger@riken.jp";
  x-sender="berenger@riken.jp"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible;
  x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: Pass (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of
  postmaster@postman.riken.jp designates 134.160.33.175 as
  permitted sender) identity=helo; client-ip=134.160.33.175;
  receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="berenger@riken.jp";
  x-sender="postmaster@postman.riken.jp";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AucBALkmxVCGoCGve2dsb2JhbABEvnQOAQEWEBYngh4BAQU4QBELGAkWDwkDAgECAUUTCAEBiA0MvmoEjD+BGoMpA4hdjSmFa41f
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,248,1355094000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="165267217"
Received: from postman3.riken.jp (HELO postman.riken.jp) ([134.160.33.175])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 10 Dec 2012 01:06:18 +0100
Received: from postman.riken.jp (postman3.riken.jp [127.0.0.1])
	by postman.riken.jp (Postfix) with SMTP id 65CA938380BD
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:06:14 +0900 (JST)
Received: from [172.27.98.103] (rikad98.riken.jp [134.160.214.98])
	by postman.riken.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 28FA538200DC
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:06:14 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <50C52776.2050800@riken.jp>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:06:14 +0900
From: Francois Berenger <berenger@riken.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: caml-list@inria.fr
References: <50C15590.1010507@riken.jp> <20121207.090650.972729327013546587.Christophe.Troestler@umons.ac.be>
In-Reply-To: <20121207.090650.972729327013546587.Christophe.Troestler@umons.ac.be>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-PMX-Version: 5.6.0.2009776, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2012.12.9.235718
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] What is the fastest? Pattern matching or if then
 else

On 12/07/2012 05:06 PM, Christophe TROESTLER wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Dec 2012 11:33:52 +0900, Francois Berenger wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I always wondered what is the fastest (at least for integers):
>
> In general, you can check these things yourself:
> https://github.com/Chris00/ocaml-benchmark

Christophe TROESTLER even did an OPAM package for benchmark:

opam update
opam install benchmark

Thanks!
F.