From: Greg K <lists@gak.com>
To: brogoff <brogoff@speakeasy.net>, Caml List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] About Obj (was Recursive lists)
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 15:10:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5.2.1.1.2.20041020150621.032312b0@ofserver.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0410110935200.20927@shell2.speakeasy.net>
GCaml? Are you saying that the GCaml extensions are in the INRIA queue for
some future version of OCaml? I was under the impression that it had fallen
off the active list when Jun Furuse left for Tokyo. Is that not true?
Greg
At 09:46 AM 10/11/2004, brogoff wrote:
>On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, james woodyatt wrote:
> > On 11 Oct 2004, at 06:38, Christophe Raffalli wrote:
> > > Jean-Christophe Filliatre wrote [quite sensibly]:
> > >>
> > >> [...]
> > >> This shouldn't be advised, and not even posted on this list.
> > >
> > > And how do you write a tail recursive map doing only one structure
> > > traversal (which is important with the penalty for memory access) on
> > > immutable list without the Obj module ?
> >
> > By using a more appropriate data structure, e.g. a lazy list. It's a
> > pay-me-now-or-pay-me-later sort of game you're playing here.
>
>Count me among those entirely unswayed by this.
>
>You could also respectfully request that the implementors provide a safe
>way to get this well known optimization WITHOUT having to resort to Obj
>usage, and, until it is provided, use the safe solution provided a few times
>already (and used in ExtLib I believe).
>
>When I asked one of the implementors about this, I received the response that
>this would be nice to have but not at the head of the queue in terms of
>upcoming desireable features. That seems like a reasonable response,
>considering
>that there are a number of not so bad workarounds, including use of Obj. I'd
>rather have GCaml extensions sooner anyways...
>
>I think Clean now provides some solution for the tail recursion modulo cons
>stuff. Anyone know other language/implementations which do?
>
>-- Brian
>
>-------------------
>To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
>Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
>Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-20 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-08 13:20 [Caml-list] Recursive lists Luca Pascali
2004-10-08 13:31 ` Keith Wansbrough
2004-10-08 14:32 ` skaller
2004-10-08 14:42 ` Alex Baretta
2004-10-08 15:43 ` David Brown
2004-10-08 17:19 ` Alex Baretta
2004-10-08 23:29 ` skaller
2004-10-09 8:35 ` Keith Wansbrough
2004-10-09 9:07 ` skaller
2004-10-09 8:32 ` Keith Wansbrough
2004-10-08 17:18 ` Wolfgang Lux
2004-10-11 0:44 ` Brian Hurt
2004-10-11 6:32 ` William Lovas
2004-10-11 6:52 ` Ville-Pertti Keinonen
2004-10-13 11:29 ` Alex Baretta
2004-10-13 11:22 ` Alex Baretta
2004-10-11 9:04 ` Keith Wansbrough
2004-10-08 14:05 ` Sébastien Furic
2004-10-08 14:44 ` Alex Baretta
2004-10-08 15:09 ` Jon Harrop
2004-10-08 15:13 ` james woodyatt
2004-10-08 14:26 ` sejourne_kevin
2004-10-08 18:28 ` Alex Baretta
2004-10-11 8:01 ` Jean-Christophe Filliatre
2004-10-11 9:20 ` Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons
2004-10-11 13:38 ` [Caml-list] About Obj (was Recursive lists) Christophe Raffalli
2004-10-11 13:49 ` [Caml-list] " Christophe Raffalli
2004-10-11 15:33 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2004-10-11 16:09 ` Richard Jones
2004-10-11 16:40 ` [Caml-list] About Obj Yamagata Yoriyuki
2004-10-13 11:59 ` Alex Baretta
2004-10-11 16:24 ` [Caml-list] About Obj (was Recursive lists) james woodyatt
2004-10-11 16:46 ` brogoff
2004-10-11 17:24 ` james woodyatt
2004-10-12 0:19 ` skaller
2004-10-20 22:10 ` Greg K [this message]
2004-10-12 15:19 ` Christophe Raffalli
2004-10-13 11:42 ` Alex Baretta
2004-10-13 21:19 ` brogoff
2004-10-14 9:52 ` Andreas Rossberg
2004-10-14 17:38 ` brogoff
2004-10-15 8:22 ` Alex Baretta
2004-10-15 17:02 ` brogoff
2004-10-17 13:42 ` Alex Baretta
2004-10-12 6:17 ` [Caml-list] Recursive lists sejourne_kevin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5.2.1.1.2.20041020150621.032312b0@ofserver.org \
--to=lists@gak.com \
--cc=brogoff@speakeasy.net \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox