From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST, SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A31BB84 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:01:31 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AscFAH8PlEnRVdqgdWdsb2JhbACUDT8BDAoLBxGuaYEIjzABAwEDhBUG X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,198,1233529200"; d="scan'208";a="21028696" Received: from mail-bw0-f160.google.com ([209.85.218.160]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 12 Feb 2009 21:01:12 +0100 Received: by bwz4 with SMTP id 4so1289971bwz.3 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:01:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KUUmp0LCRb0YwYbRrsoP84/2KmSu1o7/s4pf6xI0bbY=; b=PWayynfdnSeDfyYIAm7+/xCx1iTtNVANyN/bmXnQk/KTm0iYsM4+2xDafnGmNfRs4n rE8NrONd6nr3n60i4hYauqSkTMfV4ZZrAGKD85r7dYirkepFePDIwGTWlXKON0uhRnmv LMQXHmlI9UCiCZ8xn4GyY3asHnS1fMCTACTkE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=RGs37Q+ARquZFddE+NnhRv56KSqT5rlySfdoSkJIpyE8W2kYJqYSJsNAVDMEUUwFcA ibVWysz/sQfq41nNRSE5hJN+x1U8s5702oTOYqz7gZbscJzTZu16JJQpui7ejoxIhhwa uMd5u+kG0rSl2RZUzDeymtpK+igtB77B0R0Ns= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.113.68 with SMTP id z4mr1110514fap.72.1234468871109; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:01:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1234461980.6436.28.camel@Blefuscu> References: <1234451637.6650.39.camel@Blefuscu> <20090212171515.GC2224@usha.takhisis.invalid> <1234459674.6436.21.camel@Blefuscu> <1234461407.18023.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1234461980.6436.28.camel@Blefuscu> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:01:11 +0100 Message-ID: <4b5157c30902121201j55c00a22y72b1034b2560525b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Batteries-devel] Still that camlp4 problem From: Paolo Donadeo To: OCaml mailing list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: no; 0.00; camlp:01 ocaml:01 compiler:01 findlib:01 ocaml:01 debian:04 compiled:04 problem:05 installed:05 anybody:07 batteries:91 distribution:10 libraries:11 contribution:11 bunch:12 > I agree. Anybody against? I agree too. A question only: is it possible (and simple) to have two complete OCaml distribution (compiler, tools (findlib, etc...), and libraries) at the same time? In this moment I have a bunch of Debian packages installed, all compiled with 3.10.2: dropping OCaml 3.10, I still want to follow Batteries development, even if my contribution until now is... how can I say? Very light? :-) -- Paolo ~ ~ :wq