From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.4 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74B20BC69 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:46:11 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAM+IiUdIDtyegWdsb2JhbACQCQEBCAMGKY92hg8 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.24,278,1196636400"; d="scan'208";a="21176474" Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.158]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 13 Jan 2008 12:46:11 +0100 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l27so2256891fgb.43 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 03:46:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=4pXwwCNWoWuQ4QKf8yjAxDVy01gHZz/rzPRf7wj5YR8=; b=cd/Kev+CShwwLoPsrIt8Tocd+3pkZtgcNVQfyIFacZeadSZUy0TBSm7L00N8dCMTtqN8mNijAe9Cwe0K5STpK9g2zgZkNvOwWQjtPIaxdqVRdfqp8DBTwgYviX3y8Tjwn/NOtOQ9dbJmlZ9Kk0KDSz/jx5jM7dNEBElABsUNXhM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gjzWLHjT9ntWWl37F2b8RILgMqUJFysJDmSePkcmcrei/p8ZkihD07Tc52U4Lp0O1sZMvESO9oH7c8/9sgQmjZ9wpRz99J/tUZKKMjLyh/gdymyG8PdSE3/e4r/YDz+he8dw/lLpaI1eZkklx0WVt06kV5BNXVfxbbuQkwptjK4= Received: by 10.78.179.12 with SMTP id b12mr5823124huf.34.1200224770703; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 03:46:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.41.17 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 03:46:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4b5157c30801130346q2b333c77xdad0034a60160490@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:46:10 +0100 From: "Paolo Donadeo" To: "Lukasz Stafiniak" Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Why is ocaml so big? Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr In-Reply-To: <4a708d20801130330w3e1d7720t5a8fa24b9591cbd1@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200801111239.05507.giles@spacepigs.com> <4a708d20801111232o4a67fd78s46a765b0db1ba453@mail.gmail.com> <151970AC-218A-40F1-8963-51A30ED76F94@gmail.com> <4a708d20801130330w3e1d7720t5a8fa24b9591cbd1@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 pervasives:01 ocaml:01 tailored:98 caml-list:01 sigma:05 sigma:05 think:13 version:13 question:13 write:17 don't:19 tool:20 email:78 why:24 > You need to write your own tailored version of "Pervasives". A simple question: is OCaml the right tool for a 64K demo? I don't think so... -- Paolo Paolo Donadeo, Senior Software Engineer Studio Associato 4Sigma Email: p.donadeo@4sigma.it ~ ~ :wq