From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <weis@pauillac.inria.fr>
Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0E76BDD1
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 02:00:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35])
	by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j7Q002sc008332
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 02:00:02 +0200
Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA20525 for <caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr>; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 02:00:01 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.192])
	by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j7Q0015j016429
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 02:00:01 +0200
Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i26so147894wxd
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 17:00:00 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=E5kgHC20m4w+EaCb6d8+l/1hCxkLIjJTj2DgzEBmgvkzWDsMBg7AH7x4MQuRnVKephzwhOQkYM4KFjBYoa4BOh75RLp0Xquqn6zpo5Z5cDTiOx9h0V2S9ia4OIk/KwXKjUZC/hzVOrC6lci73bp5xj96uvarDGJCPoNWX7hoTvo=
Received: by 10.70.37.20 with SMTP id k20mr25529wxk;
        Thu, 25 Aug 2005 17:00:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.70.51.20 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 17:00:00 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4a708d20508251700632c6963@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 02:00:00 +0200
From: Lukasz Stafiniak <lukstafi@gmail.com>
To: caml users <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCamlDuce 3.08.4
In-Reply-To: <1124997485.16161.135.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <430CA5F3.50104@inria.fr>
	 <1124996020.16161.123.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <430E13B0.3060906@inria.fr>
	 <1124997485.16161.135.camel@localhost.localdomain>
X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 430E5B82.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)!
X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 430E5B81.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)!
X-Spam: no; 0.00; lukasz:01 caml-list:01 ocamlduce:01 frisch:01 ocamlduce:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 lukasz:01 wrote:01 wrote:01 supported:01 alain:03 perhaps:03 notion:04 thu:05 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP autolearn=disabled 
	version=3.0.3

> On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 20:53 +0200, Alain Frisch wrote:
> > skaller wrote:
> > > Just to confirm please, my understanding is that there is a good
> > > chance OcamlDuce will just become Ocaml (perhaps Ocaml 4.0?)
> >
> > Not at all. Where did you get this impression?
>=20
> Don't know .. but then the question .. why not?
>=20
What about a notion of supported extensions. These would not be
included into the main distribution, but each of them would have a
branch extending each other, so the user can bake any combination (or
merger) of them.

Best Regards,
Lukasz