From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q2L9U3Cq020656
	for <caml-list@sympa-roc.inria.fr>; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:30:03 +0100
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhUCAPeeaU/B/BfSkWdsb2JhbABEgxC0DwEBAQEJCwsHFAMkggkBAQUyAQVAARALGAkWDwkDAgECAUUGDQEFAgEBiAoHt1KRAQSVX4VtjSI
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,623,1325458800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="137066234"
Received: from msa01.smtpout.orange.fr (HELO msa.smtpout.orange.fr) ([193.252.23.210])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 21 Mar 2012 10:29:58 +0100
Received: from [192.168.1.105] ([86.195.5.84])
	by mwinf5d03 with ME
	id o9Vw1i0081omDHA039VwWA; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:29:57 +0100
Message-ID: <4F699F94.4090706@frisch.fr>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:29:56 +0100
From: Alain Frisch <alain@frisch.fr>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Thomas Braibant <thomas.braibant@gmail.com>
CC: Alan Schmitt <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org>,
        caml users <caml-list@inria.fr>
References: <CAOOOohQ64Fz+xp_r4pbBAXZzoSfMR=u8jXUsoLchUMO9DADVFA@mail.gmail.com> <3EB8D30A-FB02-4654-9F95-B7FF029F02FE@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp> <D63F6CC7-7CBF-484A-9232-54D9CA031CF8@polytechnique.org> <CAHR=VkyUsGi9THzBeCbxj4qy06YKOESdDUw-odGdXWpGUaQrxQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHR=VkyUsGi9THzBeCbxj4qy06YKOESdDUw-odGdXWpGUaQrxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Explicitely named type variable and type constraints.

On 03/21/2012 10:01 AM, Thomas Braibant wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Alan Schmitt
> <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org>  wrote:
>> On 21 mars 2012, at 09:21, Jacques Garrigue wrote:
>>
>>> (using 4.00, but you can also write with (val …))
>>
>> Nice teaser ;-)
>>
>
> Indeed, this is the second time I see an OCaml 4.00 mentionned (once
> here, and once on the OCamlPro webpage, with an ETA ;)).
>
> Is it the same future version of OCaml as the former 3.13, or is it
> something different ?

There is no mystery here. From 
http://caml.inria.fr/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/ocaml/version/ you can see that:

  - The 3.12 branch has been closed.
  - A new 4.00 branch has been created.


-- Alain