From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q2EAVmuH003295
	for <caml-list@sympa-roc.inria.fr>; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:31:49 +0100
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhEMABJyYE/RVdY2imdsb2JhbABDgiAEaIIur08BA4EDCCIBAQEKCQ0HEgYjggkBAQEWAg8dARscAgMSBQsNAgIFFgsCCwMCAQIBEREBBQEiDQgBAR6HaASbYIJdCosyTIJxhTI/iHQBBQuBJIkgaoQpgRYElVaFa4E+hx89hAc
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,583,1325458800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="136001495"
Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com ([209.85.214.54])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 14 Mar 2012 11:31:47 +0100
Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so2159766bkc.27
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 03:31:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=lzEXg9WXIxqsn8mUwfzt+LfdvRFPdvU9jvposl4QPj4=;
        b=kMRKJ6mmXOlPtXwyVqbA1szRd027f/Bs/OtuRAUTD6c5uIKTM/mr6e7kfBq0CEyJ4W
         HKgeagt4p4peGBrfYn5L2Ll4fDldVTZ4GUrei6TW0HqHIWz8fOVkDLV7eHTQ2TWRYli0
         LOFwHZ6q3Tb6s/1M27c1e1roS95ULphA7UDNEia/xDLyy9I4HexKUunDaH1Wk8JSejLT
         HKB8VOPuUI2ZQ1nADWNV/b8ILHzu/o6tgOUHu5vW2oaVaBCmk2gM1yeh9y9WI8ECb0hy
         n/SQjs4iiJtUrfmPqSCGnAq2VPqpb+jl6QArHTZMBkI5gTB2KT1k1x8Nu3xPpmv8R+9J
         6Xbw==
Received: by 10.204.151.86 with SMTP id b22mr762969bkw.81.1331721106964;
        Wed, 14 Mar 2012 03:31:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.27.6.206] ([213.106.240.92])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o7sm6863974bkw.16.2012.03.14.03.31.44
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Wed, 14 Mar 2012 03:31:45 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4F607390.5040705@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:31:44 +0000
From: =?UTF-8?B?TWF0ZWogS2/FocOtaw==?=
 <5764c029b688c1c0d24a2e97cd764f@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Caml List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] a question about "ocamlopt" and "ocamldep"

On 03/13/2012 06:34 PM, Matthias Puech wrote:
> This is consistent with how ocamlc/ocamlopt work: separate compilation 
> is ensured the way you think by bytecode .cmo compilation: to build a 
> module, you only need the *interfaces* of its dependencies, but it is 
> unfortunately not ensured when compiling to native code, because of the 
> global (inter-modules) optimizations performed (inlining AFAIK). Thus, 
> to build a .cmx module, you need to be aware of the actual *code* of its 
> dependencies.

:-(